Because Benedictine abbeys were designed as independent houses bound only by a shared rule and not by any central government, the family produced its own recurring reform movement: an attempt, repeated more than once, to give scattered abbeys some coordinating structure without destroying the autonomy the Rule itself assumed.
The clearest early example is Cluny, founded in Burgundy in 910, which grew into something closer to a single order with dependent priories answerable to the abbot of Cluny, a genuinely centralised model that stood in real tension with Benedict's original vision of the self governing house. Reformers in the following centuries tried gentler versions of the same idea: fifteenth century Germany produced the Bursfeld Congregation, a network of houses that kept their own abbots but agreed to shared visitation and common observance, a compromise between full Cluniac centralisation and the older total independence. England developed its own national congregation along similar lines.
None of these reforms ever became universal, which is exactly the point: Benedictine monasticism absorbed centralising experiments repeatedly across a thousand years without any of them permanently overriding the autonomous house, so that the modern Benedictine Confederation, formed only in 1893, still functions as a loose association of self governing abbeys rather than a single chain of command.