Home›Articles›A Forgery, Not an Ancient TextArticlesA Forgery, Not an Ancient TextArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A Forgery, Not an Ancient Text." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/book-of-veles-a-forgery-not-ancient-text.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A Forgery, Not an Ancient Text. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/book-of-veles-a-forgery-not-ancient-textCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-forgery-not-an-ancient-text, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A Forgery, Not an Ancient Text}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/book-of-veles-a-forgery-not-ancient-text}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreA Forgery, Not an Ancient Text The Book of Veles was presented to the public in the twentieth century as a set of wooden boards inscribed with a record of pre-Christian Slavic religion, supposedly discovered before the Second World War and known afterward only through transcriptions and photographs, since the original boards were never produced for independent examination. Slavic philologists who have studied the text agree on the verdict, which is unusual in a field where so much about pre-Christian Slavic belief remains genuinely contested. The language of the Book of Veles matches no attested stage of any Slavic language; it reads instead as a modern mixture of forms drawn from several different Slavic languages at once, assembled with invented grammar that no historical dialect ever had, and the script does not correspond to any documented writing system used by early Slavic peoples. On the strength of that evidence the text is treated by specialists as a modern fabrication rather than a surviving ancient scripture, most plausibly composed in the middle of the twentieth century, and this is one of the comparatively few questions about Slavic paganism where scholarly opinion is settled rather than tentative and actively argued.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Book of Veles as Ancient Scripture, Doctrines Well-attested Source Perun, Svarog and Others: Russian Neo-Paganism in Search of Itself (Cambridge Journal of Anthropology)Victor A. Shnirelmantier 1SourcesPerun, Svarog and Others: Russian Neo-Paganism in Search of Itself (Cambridge Journal of Anthropology)tier 1Victor A. Shnirelman, Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 2000Scholarly consensus on the Book of Veles as a modern forgeryComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year