Home›Articles›Printed First, Published SecondArticlesPrinted First, Published SecondCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Printed First, Published Second." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/complutensian-polyglot-printed-first-published-second.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Printed First, Published Second. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/complutensian-polyglot-printed-first-published-secondCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-printed-first-published-second, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Printed First, Published Second}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/complutensian-polyglot-printed-first-published-second}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MorePrinted First, Published Second History does not always reward the team that finishes first. Cardinal Cisneros's scholars completed the printing of the Complutensian Polyglot's New Testament volume, the first Greek New Testament ever set in type, in 1514, a full two years before Erasmus's rival edition appeared in Basel. But finishing the print run was not the same as publishing the book. Cisneros, a careful and institutionally minded churchman, held the completed volumes back to seek formal papal approval before releasing them for sale and circulation, a process that dragged on for years and did not conclude until 1520, with the full six-volume Bible not actually reaching booksellers and scholars until 1522. Erasmus and his publisher Johann Froben felt no such obligation to wait, and their comparatively rushed, cheaper edition reached the market in 1516, four years before the Complutensian New Testament its makers had finished printing years earlier. That gap let Erasmus's edition establish itself first among reformers and translators across Europe, becoming the working Greek text behind Luther's and Tyndale's vernacular Bibles before Cisneros's more carefully prepared edition had even been released for sale. The Complutensian Polyglot remains, by any technical measure, the more meticulous scholarly achievement of the two; it simply lost the race that mattered for influence, a race its own patron's caution helped it lose.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Complutensian Polyglot Bible, Textual Witnesses Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Original Articles, Second Editiontier 1SourcesThe Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 4th editiontier 1Bruce M. Metzger and Bart D. Ehrman, Oxford University Press, 2005Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year