Home›Articles›Second to Finish, First to PublishArticlesSecond to Finish, First to PublishCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Second to Finish, First to Publish." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/erasmus-novum-instrumentum-second-to-finish-first-to-publish.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Second to Finish, First to Publish. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/erasmus-novum-instrumentum-second-to-finish-first-to-publishCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-second-to-finish-first-to-publish, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Second to Finish, First to Publish}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/erasmus-novum-instrumentum-second-to-finish-first-to-publish}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreSecond to Finish, First to Publish The story of the first printed Greek New Testament is really the story of two editions racing each other, only one of which is usually remembered as first. Cardinal Francisco Jimenez de Cisneros's team at Alcala de Henares in Spain had finished printing their Greek and Latin New Testament, part of the larger Complutensian Polyglot Bible project, by 1514, two years before Erasmus's edition appeared. But the Polyglot could not be published, in the sense of being distributed and sold, until it received papal approval, and that approval did not arrive until 1520, with the completed multi-volume Bible not actually reaching readers until 1522. Erasmus and his publisher had no such wait to endure, and his edition reached the market in 1516, four years ahead of the technically earlier Spanish work. Because printed availability rather than printing date is what determined which text scholars, reformers and translators actually used, Erasmus's hastily assembled edition, not Cisneros's more careful one, became the Greek New Testament of the Reformation, the direct ancestor of the Textus Receptus that underlies Tyndale's English New Testament, Luther's German Bible, and eventually the King James Version. Being technically second did nothing to prevent Erasmus's edition from effectively winning.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnErasmus's Novum Instrumentum Omne, Textual Witnesses Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Original Articles, Second Editiontier 1SourcesThe Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 4th editiontier 1Bruce M. Metzger and Bart D. Ehrman, Oxford University Press, 2005Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year