Home›Articles›Binary Arithmetic, the I Ching and Chinese Natural TheologyArticlesBinary Arithmetic, the I Ching and Chinese Natural TheologyCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Binary Arithmetic, the I Ching and Chinese Natural Theology." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/gottfried-wilhelm-leibniz-binary-arithmetic-the-i-ching-and-chinese-natural-theology.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Binary Arithmetic, the I Ching and Chinese Natural Theology. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/gottfried-wilhelm-leibniz-binary-arithmetic-the-i-ching-and-chinese-natural-theologyCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-binary-arithmetic-the-i-ching-and-chines, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Binary Arithmetic, the I Ching and Chinese Natural Theology}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/gottfried-wilhelm-leibniz-binary-arithmetic-the-i-ching-and-chinese-natural-theology}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreBinary Arithmetic, the I Ching and Chinese Natural Theology Leibniz developed binary arithmetic, representing all numbers using only 0 and 1, publishing his explanation in 1703. Corresponding with the Jesuit missionary Joachim Bouvet, who was stationed in China and sent him a diagram of the I Ching's sixty four hexagrams, Leibniz recognized that the classic Chinese text's broken and unbroken lines formed a binary pattern matching his own system, and concluded, crediting the insight to ancient Chinese thought rather than claiming priority for himself, that the I Ching's legendary originators had anticipated binary mathematics millennia earlier. That exchange fed directly into Leibniz's final major work, Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese, written in the last year of his life and published posthumously, which argued that classical Confucian thought, properly understood, already contained an implicit monotheism compatible with Christian natural theology rather than being the atheistic system some contemporary European critics claimed. The work positioned Leibniz among the more sympathetic European readers of Chinese religious and philosophical tradition in his era, using it to argue for common rational and theological ground rather than treating it as something to be corrected or dismissed.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Historical Figures Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year