Learn More
The Main Deposit and the Palette's Own Genre
The Narmer Palette did not surface alone. James Quibell and Frederick Green found it during their 1897 to 1898 season inside the Main Deposit, a cache of votive objects excavated within the Temple of Horus at Hierakonpolis, though the two men's own field notes recorded the exact findspot and arrangement of the cache too loosely for later archaeologists to reconstruct it with full confidence. What is not in doubt is the company the Palette kept there: the Narmer Macehead, the Scorpion Macehead and, deposited generations later in the same sacred ground, a statue of the Second Dynasty king Khasekhemwy, carved from the same stone as the Palette itself. Egyptologists read the whole group as royal donations to the temple rather than as objects the sanctuary had always stored, which is part of why the Palette is treated first as an offering to Horus and only second as a record meant for any human audience.
The object also belongs to a specific and largely vanished genre of Egyptian craft. Ordinary Egyptians of the Naqada period ground cosmetics on small, plain stone palettes, and the shallow depression formed where Narmer's own two long necked serpopards intertwine, on the reverse face, is exactly the kind of grinding surface that ordinary form would have provided, scaled up on an object almost certainly too large and heavy for anyone to have actually used it that way. One long standing theory holds that palettes of this ceremonial kind ground cosmetics for the statues of the gods rather than for any living person. Other decorated ceremonial palettes from the same period survive, but none combines the completeness, scale and precision of carving that has made Narmer's the genre's defining example rather than merely one surviving instance of it.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.