Home›Articles›Modern Revival Schools and Their Own MaterialsArticlesModern Revival Schools and Their Own MaterialsCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Modern Revival Schools and Their Own Materials." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/neoplatonism-prayer-and-invocation-tradition-modern-revival-schools-and-their-own-materials.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Modern Revival Schools and Their Own Materials. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/neoplatonism-prayer-and-invocation-tradition-modern-revival-schools-and-their-own-materialsCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-modern-revival-schools-and-their-own-mat, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Modern Revival Schools and Their Own Materials}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/neoplatonism-prayer-and-invocation-tradition-modern-revival-schools-and-their-own-materials}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreModern Revival Schools and Their Own Materials Contemporary academic and philosophical interest in Neoplatonism has also produced a smaller number of modern organizations and study groups seeking to revive Neoplatonist philosophical and, in some cases, ritual practice, generally developing their own specific contemporary teaching material and ritual adaptation rather than claiming unbroken transmission from the ancient schools, which effectively ended as organized institutions following the closure of the Platonic Academy in Athens under Emperor Justinian in 529 CE. Because ancient theurgic ritual technique is known mainly through philosophical description rather than preserved liturgical scripts, and because modern organizations working with this material develop their own specific and separately owned interpretive and ritual content, this entry limits itself to describing ancient Neoplatonism's general theurgic practice and the existence of modern interpretive interest in it, rather than presenting any specific ancient reconstruction or modern organization's ritual material as authoritative or representative of the tradition as a whole. Plotinus, generally regarded as Neoplatonism's founding figure, was notably more reserved about ritual theurgy than his successors, emphasizing contemplative philosophical ascent instead, so the tradition's own internal history already contains real disagreement about how central ritual practice should be to genuine philosophical and spiritual progress.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnNeoplatonism Prayer and Invocation Tradition, Prayers Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year