Home›Articles›Split Between Two Collections, Read as One BookArticlesSplit Between Two Collections, Read as One BookCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Split Between Two Collections, Read as One Book." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/papyrus-46-split-between-two-collections-read-as-one-book.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Split Between Two Collections, Read as One Book. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/papyrus-46-split-between-two-collections-read-as-one-bookCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-split-between-two-collections-read-as-on, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Split Between Two Collections, Read as One Book}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/papyrus-46-split-between-two-collections-read-as-one-book}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreSplit Between Two Collections, Read as One Book A single ancient manuscript now lives in two countries. The bulk of Papyrus 46's surviving leaves belong to the Chester Beatty Biblical Papyri, the collection assembled by the mining magnate and collector Alfred Chester Beatty and now held in Dublin, but a further block of leaves entered the University of Michigan's Papyrus Collection separately, six leaves acquired in 1931 and twenty four more in 1933. That split traces back to how the manuscript reached the modern antiquities market in the first place: dealers broke up finds and sold portions to different buyers, a common fate for papyri surfacing from Egypt in the early twentieth century, and reuniting the pieces on paper, through publication and cross-referencing, became the work of subsequent scholarship rather than a single acquisition. Textual critics treat the Dublin and Michigan leaves as one manuscript for every scholarly purpose that matters, numbering them together as Papyrus 46 and reading across the institutional divide as a matter of course. The dating itself remains debated within a roughly fifty year window, the later two centuries CE, itself a reminder of how much interpretive work sits behind even a manuscript this early and this substantial: paleographic dating compares letterforms to other, better dated documents, and reasonable specialists working from the same evidence have not fully converged on one answer.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnPapyrus 46 (Chester Beatty Biblical Papyrus II), Textual Witnesses Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Original Articles, Second Editiontier 1SourcesThe Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 4th editiontier 1Bruce M. Metzger and Bart D. Ehrman, Oxford University Press, 2005Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year