Polaris is given the nature of Saturn and Venus, with the Saturn half carrying sickness, loss and trouble over inheritance, and the reading is notably grim for a star whose modern significance is entirely positive.
The disproportion is the interesting thing here. Polaris is, for most people, the single most culturally loaded star in the sky, the fixed point, the guide, the constant in Shakespeare and in a thousand metaphors, the practical instrument of navigation in the northern hemisphere. Almost none of that appears in its astrological delineation, which is minor, gloomy and concerned with illness and legacies.
The explanation is the precessional one. Polaris was not the pole star when the fixed-star tradition was being formed. Ptolemy's pole was ten degrees away, nearer Kochab. The star acquired its overwhelming symbolic significance only as precession carried the pole toward it through the medieval and early modern period, by which time the astrological attributions were already fixed and being copied forward. The tradition inherited a delineation for an ordinary circumpolar star and never revised it when the star became the pole.
This is a clean demonstration of how the fixed-star literature actually behaves: it is a copying tradition. Attributions are transmitted, not re-derived, and they do not update when the sky changes. Anyone who supposed the delineations were being freshly observed would expect Polaris to have acquired guidance, constancy and direction as significations. It did not.
Polaris is not among Agrippa's Behenian fifteen. In 1533 it was still some three degrees from the pole and less remarkable than it now is.