Home›Articles›Recognised State by State, Not as a Single Global PracticeArticlesRecognised State by State, Not as a Single Global PracticeCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Recognised State by State, Not as a Single Global Practice." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/shaman-recognised-state-by-state-not-as-a-single-global-practice.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Recognised State by State, Not as a Single Global Practice. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/shaman-recognised-state-by-state-not-as-a-single-global-practiceCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-recognised-state-by-state-not-as-a-singl, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Recognised State by State, Not as a Single Global Practice}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/shaman-recognised-state-by-state-not-as-a-single-global-practice}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreRecognised State by State, Not as a Single Global Practice Formal recognition of these practitioners, where it exists, comes from individual states and communities rather than from any body representing shamanism as a whole, because no such single tradition exists to be recognised. South Korea has designated specific gut ceremonies performed by mudang as Important Intangible Cultural Properties, protecting and funding named practitioners as living culture bearers in a manner comparable to the country's recognition of master craftspeople, while Mongolia's post-socialist revival of Tengrist and shamanic practice since the 1990s has involved both genuine reconstruction by families with living memory of practice and a wave of newly self-declared shamans responding to popular demand, a distinction Mongolian scholars and practitioners themselves actively debate. Across the specific traditions this entry declines to collapse into one, ethnographers have repeatedly documented a recurring pattern in the way individuals come to the role: an unsought illness or psychological crisis, interpreted within the tradition as a call to serve rather than as ordinary sickness, followed by a period of training under an established practitioner before the person is recognised as competent to serve their community. That pattern of a crisis-driven calling recurs across societies with no contact with one another, which is itself part of why comparative anthropologists have found the broad category difficult to abandon entirely even while agreeing that the details differ enormously and that the word imported from the Evenki language flattens them.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnShaman, Religious Roles & Titles Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year