Home›Articles›The Shroud, and the State of the EvidenceArticlesThe Shroud, and the State of the EvidenceCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The Shroud, and the State of the Evidence." Accessed September 1, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/turin-the-shroud-and-the-state-of-the-evidence.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The Shroud, and the State of the Evidence. Retrieved September 1, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/turin-the-shroud-and-the-state-of-the-evidenceCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-shroud-and-the-state-of-the-evidence, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The Shroud, and the State of the Evidence}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/turin-the-shroud-and-the-state-of-the-evidence}, note = {Accessed September 1, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreThe Shroud, and the State of the Evidence A linen cloth over four metres long carries a faint double image, front and back, of a man laid out after a scourging and a crucifixion. Its documented history begins in the 1350s at Lirey in France, where a local bishop shortly afterwards wrote to the pope that the cloth was being exhibited for gain and that an artist had confessed to producing it. It passed to the House of Savoy, survived a fire at Chambery in 1532 that left melted silver marks and patches sewn by nuns, and came to Turin in 1578, where it has been kept ever since. Interest in the modern sense began in 1898, when a photographer permitted to record it found that his glass negative showed a far clearer and more natural image than the cloth itself, which is to say the image behaves like a photographic negative. In 1988 a sample was divided between three laboratories, which independently dated the linen to between about 1260 and 1390, a result consistent with the documentary record. Supporters of authenticity have argued that the sample came from a repaired corner or was contaminated, and textile and imaging studies have continued in both directions since. The Catholic Church has never declared the cloth authentic. Popes have described it as an icon and a mirror of the gospel and left the question of its origin to science, and it is exhibited publicly only at long intervals.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnTurin, Cities Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year