Emptiness is read as a relation rather than a bare absence. Ultimate reality, the buddha nature spoken of in the third turning of the wheel, is empty of the adventitious defilements that are other than it, but is not empty of its own luminous nature. Proponents hold that a purely negative emptiness cannot account for what the tantras say is realised; opponents hold that the position smuggles a permanent self back in under another name. It is the distinctive teaching of the Jonang tradition and was suppressed in central Tibet for centuries on that account.
Facts
Disputed
Point in DisputeProponents hold that a purely negative emptiness cannot account for what the tantras say is realised; opponents hold that the position smuggles a permanent self back in under another name. 1 Other-emptiness, shentong, the distinctive teaching of the Jonang tradition and read in comparable terms by the Karma Kagyu after the Third Karmapa, holds that ultimate reality, the buddha nature spoken of in the third turning of the wheel of teaching, is empty of the adventitious defilements that are other than it, but is not itself empty of its own luminous nature. Cyrus Stearns's study of the Jonang master Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, who gave the teaching its most developed form in the fourteenth century, records that proponents hold a purely negative account of emptiness cannot explain what the tantras describe as actually realised in meditation, while opponents, chiefly the Gelug tradition, hold that positing a nature not itself empty smuggles a permanent self back into the teaching under another name. The dispute was severe enough that the teaching and its textual tradition were suppressed in central Tibet for centuries, with the Jonang lineage surviving at a distance from the center of Tibetan religious authority. The disagreement remains unresolved because it concerns how to read the same third-turning scriptures both sides accept as authoritative, and neither side's reading has been shown to be textually impossible. Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteThe position was suppressed in central Tibet for centuries on account of this teaching, and the Jonang lineage survived at a distance from the centre. 1 Origins
Held ByThe distinctive teaching of the Jonang tradition, and read in these terms by the Karma Kagyu after the Third Karmapa. 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionBinding, without a formal definition 1Tradition: Jonang Status Within the TraditionRejected, or not held, within this tradition 1Tradition: Gelug Learn More
Dolpopa's Doctrine, Recovered From Its Own Suppression
Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, born in 1292 and trained first within the Sakya tradition before his own thinking diverged from it, built the doctrine that became shentong from a close reading of buddha nature literature and the Kalachakra tantra, texts he read as describing an ultimate reality that is positively present rather than a mere absence. On his account, the buddha nature spoken of in Mahayana sutras is not empty of its own qualities, only empty of the adventitious defilements that are other than it and obscure it from view, so that awakening is a matter of removing what covers an already complete nature rather than constructing something that was not there before. Dolpopa taught this at Jonang monastery, which gave the position its later name, and treated it as the teaching the tantras themselves point to when they describe an ultimate reality that practitioners realize directly rather than infer through negation alone. Cyrus Stearns's scholarly reconstruction of Dolpopa's own Tibetan writings, produced because so much of that record had been actively suppressed for centuries after his death, is largely why a reader outside the tradition can now access his argument in anything like its own terms rather than only through the later polemics of the schools that opposed it.
How a Suppressed School Survived at the Edge of Tibet
Shentong doctrine did not simply lose a philosophical argument and fade; it was administratively suppressed. In the mid seventeenth century, under the government the fifth Dalai Lama established, Jonang's central Tibetan monasteries, including Dolpopa's own seat, were closed to the tradition, their libraries partly sealed, and their monastic populations converted into Gelug institutions, a decisive political intervention rather than a gradual loss of adherents. The suppression was effective in central Tibet specifically, which is why later generations of Tibetan Buddhists there sometimes described shentong as an extinct or purely historical position. It was never extinct at the edge of the Tibetan cultural world. Jonang communities in the Amdo and Golok regions of eastern Tibet, geographically distant from the central government's reach, kept ordaining monks and teaching the doctrine without interruption across the same centuries, and Jonang institutions in that region remain active today. The tradition also found new attention within the nineteenth century Rime, or non sectarian, movement, whose leading scholars treated shentong as a serious philosophical option worth studying on its own terms rather than as a settled error, restoring it to wider Tibetan Buddhist conversation from outside the school that had tried to end it.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Position On
Shentong, ultimate reality empty of what is other than itself. The other of the two readings.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.