Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Beliefs & Restrictions

The Immaculate Conception and bodily Assumption of Mary

Core Tenets

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1854 to 1950

Two Catholic dogmas about Mary, defined late and by papal act rather than by council. The Immaculate Conception, proclaimed by Pius IX in 1854, holds that Mary was preserved from original sin from the first moment of her own conception, by anticipation of Christ's merits; it concerns her conception, not the virgin birth of Jesus, a confusion common among non-Catholics. The Assumption, proclaimed by Pius XII in 1950, holds that at the end of her earthly life she was taken body and soul into heaven, leaving open whether she died first. Eastern Orthodoxy keeps the feast of the Dormition and honours Mary highly, but rejects the Immaculate Conception because it presupposes the Augustinian account of inherited guilt. Protestants reject both as lacking scriptural warrant.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Defined and binding within this tradition 2Tradition: Roman Catholicism
Sourced to the subject's own accountDefined dogma, by papal act in 1854 and again in 1950
Status Within the Tradition
Rejected, or not held, within this tradition 1Tradition: Anglicanism
Not held as an article of faith
Status Within the Tradition
Rejected, or not held, within this tradition 3Tradition: Eastern Orthodoxy
The Dormition is kept and Mary is called all-holy, but the Immaculate Conception is not held, resting as it does on a doctrine of original sin the East does not share
Belief
Subject
Sacred history: what happened 1
Origins
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account
1854 to 1950 4
Learn More
The Immaculate Conception and the Assumption

Roman Catholics affirm two dogmas about Mary. The Immaculate Conception, defined by Pope Pius IX in 1854, holds that Mary was preserved free from original sin from the first moment of her conception, by the grace of God in view of the merits of Christ. The Assumption, defined by Pope Pius XII in 1950, holds that at the end of her earthly life Mary was taken up body and soul into heavenly glory. Both express the Catholic conviction that the mother of Christ was uniquely graced and is the foremost of the redeemed.

Pius IX proclaimed the Immaculate Conception in the bull Ineffabilis Deus (1854), and Pius XII proclaimed the Assumption in Munificentissimus Deus (1950); neither doctrine rests on an explicit biblical statement, and both are argued instead from centuries of patristic reflection on texts such as the angel's greeting to Mary as "full of grace" (Luke 1:28) and from a long liturgical tradition of feasts, the Dormition or Assumption feast attested in the Eastern church from at least the sixth century and the Immaculate Conception feast observed in the West from the Middle Ages before its doctrinal definition. Pius XII's definition followed a formal worldwide consultation of the Catholic episcopate, initiated by the 1946 encyclical Deiparae Virginis Mariae, which found near-unanimous support among bishops for proceeding to a dogmatic definition.

Dogma, Infallibility, and Other Churches

These two definitions are the exercises of papal authority most often cited in connection with papal infallibility, the Assumption being the one statement since 1870 universally agreed to meet its conditions. The Eastern Orthodox venerate Mary highly and keep the feast of her Dormition ("falling asleep") but do not define the Immaculate Conception, holding a different understanding of original sin; most Protestants reject both as lacking scriptural warrant. The affirmation thus marks a distinctively Roman Catholic development of Marian devotion and doctrine.

Eastern Orthodoxy's objection is not merely that the Immaculate Conception lacks conciliar warrant but that it answers a question posed by a Western, Augustinian doctrine of original sin as inherited guilt that Orthodox theology does not share; Orthodox teaching speaks instead of ancestral sin, an inherited mortality and tendency to sin rather than personal guilt transmitted from Adam, so that the Western dogma addresses a problem the Eastern tradition frames differently rather than one it simply leaves unanswered.

Anglican and Lutheran churches have at times shown sympathy toward the Assumption as pious devotion while declining to bind consciences to either doctrine, whereas Reformed and evangelical Protestants generally reject both as unwarranted by scripture and as instances of a Marian devotion they judge to have grown beyond what the New Testament supports.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Mary, Figures

Belongs to Tradition

Source Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd editionHoly Seethe holders' own account
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005s.v. Immaculate ConceptionView the Source
2. Ineffabilis Deus
Pope Pius IX, 1854the holders' own account
3. Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes
John Meyendorff, Fordham University Press, 1979View the Source
4. Munificentissimus Deus
Pope Pius XII, 1950the holders' own account
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd edition
Holy See, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1997paragraphs 490 to 493, and paragraph 966the holders' own accountView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.