Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Calendars

The Positivist Calendar

Solar

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1849

Comte proposed his thirteen-month calendar in 1849 as part of the Religion of Humanity, replacing the months of the Gregorian calendar with thirteen months of exactly twenty-eight days each, so that every month began on the same weekday and the calendar's structure never drifted the way the ordinary Gregorian month lengths do. Each month was named for and dedicated to a great historical figure held to exemplify one field of human achievement, Moses, Homer, Aristotle, Archimedes, Caesar, Saint Paul, Charlemagne, Dante, Gutenberg, Shakespeare, Descartes, Frederick the Great and the physiologist Bichat, and each of the twenty-eight days within a month was in turn dedicated to a lesser figure in the same field, so that the calendar named, in Comte's own count, five hundred and fifty eight notable figures across the full year. The thirteen months of twenty-eight days total 364 days, and Comte closed the gap with an intercalary Festival of the Dead placed outside the week cycle at year's end, with a second such day, a Festival of Holy Women, added in leap years.

Facts
Origins
Historical Origin
Devised by Auguste Comte in 1849 as part of his Religion of Humanity, replacing the months with the names of figures Comte considered humanity's great benefactors. 2
Origin Period
1849 2
Origin Period
Comte's calendar dates to a single year, 1849, when he proposed it as part of the Religion of Humanity. 1
Place of Origin
France 2
Attributed Author / Compiler
Auguste Comte 2
Origin of the Name
Named for Positivism, the philosophical system founded by its creator, Auguste Comte. 2
Attributions
Epoch
Proposed by Auguste Comte in 1849 as part of the Religion of Humanity, replacing the Gregorian months with thirteen fixed months of twenty eight days each. 1
Year Length
365-366 days 2
Calendar Type
Solar 2
Associated Religion
The Religion of Humanity 2
Structure
Structure
Thirteen months of exactly twenty-eight days, so that every month opens on the same weekday and the pattern never shifts, 364 days in all. The remainder is carried by a Festival of the Dead placed outside the week cycle at the close of the year, with a Festival of Holy Women added in leap years. 2
Reckoning
Repeating Cycle
1
Status
Status Today
Historical; not practised continuously 2
Learn More
Thirteen Months, Five Hundred and Fifty Eight Names

Comte's calendar reform addressed a problem every Gregorian month shares: none of them is the same length, so a given date falls on a different weekday every year and the calendar's grid never repeats cleanly. Thirteen months of exactly twenty-eight days, four weeks each, solved this arithmetically, at the cost of adding a month beyond the familiar twelve and requiring an extra day or two, kept outside the ordinary week entirely, to reach 365.

Comte used the freed structure to turn the calendar into a teaching tool for his new religion: each month commemorated one field of human achievement through its namesake, Moses for early theocracy, Homer for epic poetry, Aristotle for ancient philosophy, and onward through Caesar for statesmanship, Charlemagne for feudal civilisation, Dante and Shakespeare for modern poetry, Gutenberg for the modern industrial arts, and Descartes for modern philosophy, with the physician Bichat closing the year for modern science. Each of the twenty-eight days inside a month carried a further dedication to a lesser figure in that same field, so that a positivist consulting the calendar was, in Comte's design, reminded daily of a specific contributor to human civilisation, a form of veneration meant to replace the saints' days of the Catholic calendar it was structurally descended from.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Promulgated By

Sources
1. Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings
Gertrud Lenzer (ed.), Transaction Publishers, 1998
2. The Oxford Companion to the Year: An Exploration of Calendar Customs and Time-Reckoning
Bonnie Blackburn and Leofranc Holford-Strevens, Oxford University Press, 1999View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.