Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Councils and Synods

The Second Council of Constantinople

Also Known As The Fifth Ecumenical Council
Christian Councils

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The fifth ecumenical council, convened by the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I at Constantinople in 553 CE to settle the Three Chapters controversy, condemning as heretical the writings of Theodore of Mopsuestia, Theodoret of Cyrus's polemics against Cyril of Alexandria, and a letter attributed to Ibas of Edessa, all associated in different degrees with Nestorian christology. The council reaffirmed the christological formula of the Council of Chalcedon while framing the condemnation in language meant to draw Miaphysite Christians, who rejected Chalcedon, back toward communion with the wider church, an effort that largely failed in the eastern provinces where Miaphysite churches persisted. Pope Vigilius, held at Constantinople by Justinian through the proceedings, initially opposed the council's condemnations before eventually accepting them under continued pressure.

Facts
Scholarship
How Its Legacy Is Contested
The condemnation of the Three Chapters, issued without the participation of most Western bishops, produced a lasting schism centered on the Patriarchate of Aquileia, whose bishops refused the council's decrees; the schism was not fully healed until 698, when the Aquileian patriarch Peter, urged by Pope Sergius I, formally renounced it. 1
The Event
Principal Parties
Convened by the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I. Pope Vigilius, held at Constantinople through the proceedings, was the council's most significant Western holdout before eventually accepting its decrees; the condemned writings belonged to Theodore of Mopsuestia, Theodoret of Cyrus and Ibas of Edessa. 1
Consequences
Lasting Consequence
Failed to reconcile the Miaphysite churches, and Pope Vigilius's eventual acceptance of the council cost him support among Western bishops 1
Learn More
Justinian's Bid to Settle the Three Chapters

By the middle of the sixth century, the Christological settlement reached at Chalcedon in 451 had failed to hold the church together. Miaphysite Christians, concentrated in Egypt, Syria and Armenia, rejected Chalcedon's formula of two natures in one person as a concession to Nestorianism, the condemned teaching that divided Christ into two separate persons, divine and human. Justinian, ruling an empire that still contained large Miaphysite populations he needed to reconcile, sought a way to affirm Chalcedon while distancing it from anything that could be read as Nestorian.

His solution was to condemn three specific bodies of writing, the so called Three Chapters: the person and work of Theodore of Mopsuestia, a theologian whose language on Christ's two natures Miaphysites read as crypto-Nestorian; certain polemical writings of Theodoret of Cyrus directed against Cyril of Alexandria, the Miaphysites' own theological authority; and a letter attributed to Ibas of Edessa that likewise drew Miaphysite objection. None of the three had been condemned at Chalcedon itself, so Justinian reasoned that removing them would strip away exactly the material Miaphysites found objectionable without touching Chalcedon's own decrees.

Vigilius Under Pressure, and a Reconciliation That Did Not Take

Pope Vigilius had been summoned, in effect brought under guard, to Constantinople years before the council met, and his relationship with Justinian through the whole affair was one of pressure rather than partnership. Vigilius resisted condemning the Three Chapters for years, worried that doing so would look like a retroactive attack on Chalcedon itself and would alienate Western bishops who saw no need to revisit a settlement they considered closed, and he was not present at the council's sessions when it finally opened in 553. Under continued pressure from Justinian after the council concluded its work, he eventually issued his own condemnation of the Three Chapters and accepted the council's decisions, a reversal that cost him support among Western bishops, some of whom broke communion with Rome over it in a schism that lingered in parts of northern Italy for more than a century.

The reconciliation with the Miaphysites that Justinian had hoped the council would produce did not materialize. Miaphysite church leadership in Egypt and Syria had by this point developed its own independent hierarchy and had little incentive to accept a settlement engineered from Constantinople, and the same churches, now generally called Oriental Orthodox, remain out of communion with the churches that accept Chalcedon and this council to the present day.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Constantinople, Cities

The Second Council of Constantinople met in the city in 553 CE.

Belongs to Tradition

Source Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 volumesNorman P. Tanner (ed.)

Rejected Here

Assyrian Church of the East, Denominations

The council condemned Theodore of Mopsuestia by name, and Theodore is one of the three teachers the Church of the East holds to be authoritative, so its refusal is direct and not a matter of numbering.

Oriental Orthodoxy, Denominations

Not received, because the council confirms Chalcedon, and the Oriental Orthodox churches number three councils and no more.

Source Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 volumesNorman P. Tanner (ed.)

Element Of

The fifth of the seven councils, and the one that answers the charge that Chalcedon had conceded too much to a Nestorian reading.

Source Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 volumesNorman P. Tanner (ed.)

The fifth ecumenical council, received for its condemnation of the Three Chapters and its reading of Chalcedon in a Cyrilline sense.

Source Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 volumesNorman P. Tanner (ed.)
Sources
1. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 volumes
Norman P. Tanner (ed.), Sheed and Ward / Georgetown University Press, 1990View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.