Thysia (Greek Animal Sacrifice), Rituals
Standing
Concerns Standing as a Comparative Category
Currently States Used, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed
The first position, from Karl Meuli to Walter Burkert, reads the rite as the preserved structure of a hunting kill, with the hidden knife, the staged consent of the animal and the collective scattering of grain distributing the guilt of the killing among the whole company present. The second, associated with Jean-Pierre Vernant and Marcel Detienne, sets guilt aside and reads it as a system of cooking and distribution that fixes the human place between gods who take only smoke and beasts that eat raw flesh, with the division of meat marking the political shape of the community. A third position, argued by Gunnel Ekroth from the evidence of hero cult and already recorded in this atlas's own article on the rite, attacks the handbook opposition between Olympian sacrifice, eaten, and sacrifice to heroes and chthonic powers, burned entire, on the ground that the two shade into each other far more than the two-camp framework allows. Walter Burkert's Greek Religion, cited here, supplies the first position and the described structure of the rite itself. None of the three readings has displaced the others, which is why thysia's standing as a comparative sacrificial category is recorded as debated rather than resolved.
Source Greek Religion, Walter Burkert