Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The World's Writing Systems

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This survey was assembled from contributions by specialists in individual writing systems, each covering the script they work on directly rather than one or two editors generalizing across scripts they do not specialize in, which is the real structural strength behind treating it as an authority here. It was added to this atlas specifically to fill a gap: the collection previously held no dedicated authority on the history and structure of the Hebrew, Greek and Latin alphabets, only general reference entries. This record has not independently traced a documented history of corrections between its printings. It is a strong source for a script's origins, letter count and structural development. It is not a source on the religious or magical significance later traditions attached to individual letters, which is a separate claim needing its own separate citation.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A scholarly survey of the world's writing systems from a university press, edited by two specialists in linguistics and epigraphy, the standard academic reference for how scripts originated and developed.
Notes
Standard scholarly survey of the world's scripts. Added by the browse-property Kabbalah/Magic/Angels batch because the corpus previously held no Tier-1 writing-systems authority: its only alphabet references were Tier-2 reference articles. Cited here for the letter-counts and origins of the Hebrew, Greek and Latin alphabets at browse-grouping level.
Citation
Author
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1996
URL
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-worlds-writing-systems-9780195079937
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (8,006 claims)

This source backs 8,006 claims across the atlas. As facts: 6,287 well-attested, 104 scholarly debate, 6 open question. As cited relationships: 784 holds, 9 connected. Plus 816 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Alphabet Letters, 6,255 claims: 4,757 well-attested, 103 scholarly debate, 5 open question, 691 holds, 699 general references.
  • Articles, 1,276 claims: 1,264 well-attested, 5 holds, 7 general references.
  • Languages, 200 claims: 73 well-attested, 55 holds, 72 general references.
  • Scripts & Magical Alphabets, 120 claims: 73 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 25 holds, 21 general references.
  • Open Questions, 102 claims: 80 well-attested, 1 holds, 9 connected, 12 general references.
  • Subcategories, 33 claims: 25 well-attested, 4 holds, 4 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 12 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 open question, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.

Open question

6

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.