Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Divinity Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3,338 statements marked Debated.

Transcendentalism, Origin Period End Year1850

Transcendentalism, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Origin Period End Year

Currently States 1850

Ralph Waldo Emerson himself judged the movement to be declining by the late 1840s, and its circle scattered further after Margaret Fuller's death in 1850; some historians extend the movement's active life into the 1850s or beyond.

Source Encyclopedia of American Religions, J. Gordon Melton

Trebaruna, Domain / FunctionHearth and domestic fire

Trebaruna, Deities

Standing

Concerns Domain / Function

Currently States Hearth and domestic fire

The Cabeco das Fraguas inscription, the fullest surviving text naming her, records only that she received a lamb in a multi-deity sacrifice and gives no explicit domain of its own. The common description of her as a hearth or household protector goddess rests on comparison with her named companions in the text and on how her name has sometimes been parsed, rather than on any explicit ancient statement of her function, so her precise role remains a scholarly reconstruction rather than a flatly attested fact.

Source Jose d'Encarnacao, Jose d'Encarnacao

Triglav, Point in DisputeWhether Triglav was an independent Baltic Slavic deity or a regional cult title of a more widely worshipped god such as Svarog or Perun, a question the missionary sources that record him cannot settle on their own.

Triglav, Deities

Standing

Concerns Point in Dispute

Currently States Whether Triglav was an independent Baltic Slavic deity or a regional cult title of a more widely worshipped god such as Svarog or Perun, a question the missionary sources that record him cannot settle on their own.

Because Triglav is known chiefly through Christian missionary accounts written to justify destroying his cult, comparative Slavic scholarship is divided over whether he was an independent deity in his own right or a regional cult title or local hypostasis of a more widely worshipped Slavic god such as Svarog or Perun. The missionary sources describe his cult in enough ritual detail to argue either reading, and no earlier native testimony survives to settle it.

Source Slavic Gods and Heroes, Judith Kalik and Alexander Uchitel

Triglav, Scholarly Standing DetailScholars disagree about what Triglav's three heads signified. Some read them as representing dominion over the three cosmic realms of heaven, earth and the underworld, paralleling other tripartite cult imagery in Baltic Slavic religion, while others connect the number instead to the three separate cult sites at Szczecin, Wolin and Brandenburg where his image is independently attested, since the missionary biographers who describe the idol never explain its meaning in the god's own terms and the debate remains unresolved.

Triglav, Deities

Standing

Concerns Scholarly Standing Detail

Currently States Scholars disagree about what Triglav's three heads signified. Some read them as representing dominion over the three cosmic realms of heaven, earth and the underworld, paralleling other tripartite cult imagery in Baltic Slavic religion, while others connect the number instead to the three separate cult sites at Szczecin, Wolin and Brandenburg where his image is independently attested, since the missionary biographers who describe the idol never explain its meaning in the god's own terms and the debate remains unresolved.

Source Slavic Gods and Heroes, Judith Kalik and Alexander Uchitel

Trisong Detsen, TraditionRuled for the Indian gradual path against the Chinese Chan position at the debate of Samye

Trisong Detsen, Figures

Standing

Concerns Tradition

Currently States Ruled for the Indian gradual path against the Chinese Chan position at the debate of Samye

According To Tibetan Buddhism

Sam van Schaik's Tibet: A History (2011) examines the conflicting accounts of the Council of Lhasa, the doctrinal debate held under Emperor Trisong Detsen. Van Schaik's method is comparative, checking the later Tibetan histories, which report a decisive victory for the Indian master Kamalasila, against Chinese manuscripts recovered at Dunhuang, which claim the opposite result for the Chan master Moheyan; on that basis many historians treat the event as a protracted, inconclusive court argument later compressed by both sides' historians into a single formal disputation with a clear winner.

Source Tibet: A History, Sam van Schaik

Tukaram, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year1608

Tukaram, Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 1608

The source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Denise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York (eds.)

Tukaram, Lifespan or Floruit End Year1650

Tukaram, Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 1650

The source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Denise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York (eds.)

Tulsidas, Place of OriginTraditionally Rajapur, in Chitrakoot district, Uttar Pradesh; a rival tradition places it at Soron in Kasganj district, which the Uttar Pradesh government officially recognized in 2012.

Tulsidas, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Place of Origin

Currently States Traditionally Rajapur, in Chitrakoot district, Uttar Pradesh; a rival tradition places it at Soron in Kasganj district, which the Uttar Pradesh government officially recognized in 2012.

Philip Lutgendorf's The Life of a Text: Performing the Ramcaritmanas of Tulsidas (University of California Press, 1991) surveys as many as seven places claimed as Tulsidas's birthplace across different regional traditions, and identifies the genuinely live scholarly dispute as between two of them, Rajapur and Soron, each backed by a manuscript tradition its supporters claim is in the poet's own hand. Lutgendorf's method is textual and historiographical, tracing how each claim has been argued and promoted, including by government tourism designation of one site, and finds the manuscript evidence on each side insufficiently verified to settle the question, which remains genuinely unresolved among specialists in the text's history regardless of the tourism designation's implicit endorsement of one location.

Source The Life of a Text: Performing the Ramcaritmanas of Tulsidas, Philip Lutgendorf

Tulsidas, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year1532

Tulsidas, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 1532

The source gives this year as about, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source The Life of a Text: Performing the Ramcaritmanas of Tulsidas, Philip Lutgendorf

Tulsidas, Lifespan or Floruit End Year1623

Tulsidas, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 1623

The source gives this year as about, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.

Source The Life of a Text: Performing the Ramcaritmanas of Tulsidas, Philip Lutgendorf

Tunisia, Legal StatusThe 2014 constitution names Islam the state religion (Article 1) while declaring Tunisia a civil state based on citizenship (Article 2) and protecting freedom of belief and conscience (Article 6); the durability of these protections has been questioned since President Kais Saied's 2021-2022 concentration of executive power.

Tunisia, Countries

Standing

Concerns Legal Status

Currently States The 2014 constitution names Islam the state religion (Article 1) while declaring Tunisia a civil state based on citizenship (Article 2) and protecting freedom of belief and conscience (Article 6); the durability of these protections has been questioned since President Kais Saied's 2021-2022 concentration of executive power.

Tunisia's 2014 constitution, adopted after the 2011 revolution that began the wider Arab Spring, names Islam the state religion in Article 1 while in the same document declaring Tunisia a civil state based on citizenship in Article 2 and separately protecting freedom of belief and conscience in Article 6, a text that was itself the product of negotiated compromise between Islamist and secular political factions during the constitution's drafting. Rights groups have raised concern about the durability of this settlement since President Kais Saied's 2021 to 2022 concentration of executive power, in which he suspended parliament, rewrote the constitution by referendum, and assumed powers to rule largely by decree, changes critics describe as dismantling the checks that had made the 2014 compromise workable. The dispute is over whether the religious-freedom and civil-state provisions have actually been eroded by the changes to the surrounding constitutional order, or remain intact as written despite the changes around them.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Turkic, Homeland HypothesisMost often placed in southern Siberia or Mongolia. The shallow depth of the family limits how far reconstruction can reach.

Turkic, Language Families

Standing

Concerns Homeland Hypothesis

Currently States Most often placed in southern Siberia or Mongolia. The shallow depth of the family limits how far reconstruction can reach.

Turkic expanded fast and recently enough that its languages remain close, which is good for reconstructing the proto-language and poor for locating it, because the differences that would separate one candidate homeland from another have not had time to accumulate.

Source An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples, Peter B. Golden

Turtle, Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThe words spirit animal and totem are used in popular Western practice for a personal animal ally. Native scholars and communities object to both usages, on the ground that they take the vocabulary and the authority of particular Indigenous traditions and apply them to a generic and commercial practice.

Turtle, Animals & Totems

Standing

Concerns Contested or Appropriated Modern Use

Currently States The words spirit animal and totem are used in popular Western practice for a personal animal ally. Native scholars and communities object to both usages, on the ground that they take the vocabulary and the authority of particular Indigenous traditions and apply them to a generic and commercial practice.

Suzanne Owen's The Appropriation of Native American Spirituality (Continuum, 2008) documents the objection Indigenous communities in North America raise, ongoing and in the present tense, against the commercial "spirit animal" genre. Owen's study examines how the practice borrows specific Indigenous terms and claimed lineages, presenting them as licensing a service sold to outside customers, and sets that use against the communities' own accounts of what those terms and practices mean within their traditions. What is disputed, on Owen's reading, is not that people generally feel a kinship with animals, a widely attested feeling that belongs to no one tradition, but the specific commercial borrowing of Indigenous vocabulary and claimed authority. The atlas records the animal, records that the modern commercial practice exists, and records that this documented objection is made, without adjudicating between the parties.

Source The Appropriation of Native American Spirituality, Suzanne Owen

Tutankhamun, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year-1341

Tutankhamun, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States -1341

Genetic and skeletal analysis published in 2010 put his age at death around eighteen or nineteen, from which his birth year is commonly reconstructed as around 1341 BCE, but that figure moves with which Egyptian chronology and which estimate of his exact death year a source adopts.

Source The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt, Ian Shaw (ed.)

Tutankhamun, Lifespan or Floruit End Year-1323

Tutankhamun, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States -1323

The year of his death is fixed within a narrow range by the length of his reign rather than by a single dated record, and standard references give 1324 or 1323 BCE depending on which regnal reconstruction they follow.

Source The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt, Ian Shaw (ed.)

Two Kingdoms, Contested or Appropriated Modern UseInvoked by some German Lutheran leaders in the 1930s to justify quietism toward the Nazi state, a use the Confessing Church movement, including Dietrich Bonhoeffer, rejected as a misapplication of Luther's teaching.

Two Kingdoms, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Contested or Appropriated Modern Use

Currently States Invoked by some German Lutheran leaders in the 1930s to justify quietism toward the Nazi state, a use the Confessing Church movement, including Dietrich Bonhoeffer, rejected as a misapplication of Luther's teaching.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition, F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Two Qnome in One Parsopa, the Christology of the Church of the East, Point in DisputeThe formula is neither the Chalcedonian one of two natures in one hypostasis nor the miaphysite one of a single incarnate nature, which makes it the third position in the ancient christological division rather than a variant of either. The Catholic Church and the Assyrian Church of the East have since acknowledged that they confess the same faith in the Son in different formulations.

Two Qnome in One Parsopa, the Christology of the Church of the East, Beliefs & Restrictions

Standing

Concerns Point in Dispute

Currently States The formula is neither the Chalcedonian one of two natures in one hypostasis nor the miaphysite one of a single incarnate nature, which makes it the third position in the ancient christological division rather than a variant of either. The Catholic Church and the Assyrian Church of the East have since acknowledged that they confess the same faith in the Son in different formulations.

The Church of the East confesses that in Christ there are two kyane, natures, and two qnome, individual subsistences of those natures, united in one parsopa, translated as person, of filiation. Qnoma is not the same concept as the Greek hypostasis used in Chalcedonian christology, and translating qnoma as person in earlier controversies is what produced the historical charge that this church teaches two sons rather than one; the church holds it teaches no such thing, since the one parsopa is the single subject who is Christ. The formula is neither the Chalcedonian two-natures-in-one-hypostasis formula nor the miaphysite single-incarnate-nature formula, making it a third position in the ancient christological division rather than a variant of either side. The Common Christological Declaration signed by Pope John Paul II and Patriarch Mar Dinkha IV in 1994, the churches' own joint ecumenical statement rather than independent theological analysis, formally acknowledged that the Catholic Church and the Assyrian Church of the East confess the same faith in the Son in different formulations, addressing the historical charge at the level of official church relations even though the underlying terminological questions about qnoma and hypostasis continue to be studied by theologians on both sides.

Source Common Christological Declaration between the Catholic Church and the Assyrian Church of the East, John Paul II and Mar Dinkha IV

Tyr, LineageThe Prose Edda names Tyr son of Odin. The Eddic poem Hymiskvida instead calls him son of the giant Hymir, naming Hymir's wife as his mother.

Tyr, Figures

Standing

Concerns Lineage

Currently States The Prose Edda names Tyr son of Odin. The Eddic poem Hymiskvida instead calls him son of the giant Hymir, naming Hymir's wife as his mother.

Snorri Sturluson's thirteenth century Prose Edda names Tyr son of Odin, while the older anonymous Eddic poem Hymiskvida instead calls him son of the giant Hymir, naming Hymir's wife as his mother. Snorri's Edda is a scholarly compilation of earlier oral and poetic material rather than an independent witness, and Hymiskvida survives only within the same medieval Icelandic manuscript tradition, so neither poem can be checked against an outside source. No surviving text explains or reconciles the two genealogies, and nothing beyond these two poems has come down to settle which parentage, if either, reflects the older tradition.

Source The Prose Edda, Snorri Sturluson

Tyr, LineageNorse sources disagree about Tyr's parentage. The Prose Edda's Gylfaginning lists him among the sons of Odin, while the Poetic Edda's Hymiskvida instead calls him son of the giant Hymir and describes a giant stepmother with nine hundred heads. Scholars read the discrepancy as evidence of shifting or regionally varied traditions rather than a single fixed genealogy for the god.

Tyr, Deities

Standing

Concerns Lineage

Currently States Norse sources disagree about Tyr's parentage. The Prose Edda's Gylfaginning lists him among the sons of Odin, while the Poetic Edda's Hymiskvida instead calls him son of the giant Hymir and describes a giant stepmother with nine hundred heads. Scholars read the discrepancy as evidence of shifting or regionally varied traditions rather than a single fixed genealogy for the god.

Source The Prose Edda, Snorri Sturluson

Tzaddi צ, Origin PeriodScholem places Sefer Yetzirah between the second and sixth century CE

Tzaddi צ, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Scholem places Sefer Yetzirah between the second and sixth century CE

According To Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters

Gershom Scholem's Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken Books, New York, 1961) surveys the manuscript recensions of Sefer Yetzirah and finds no single stable text: the surviving copies diverge enough in wording and in the letter-to-planet and letter-to-sign correspondences that quoting "the text" requires naming which recension is meant. Comparing the linguistic style, the doctrinal content and the external references made to the work across centuries of citation, Scholem argues the book could have been composed anywhere from the second to the ninth century CE, a span of roughly a millennium, with later Kabbalistic and Hasidic writers each reading it through their own era's overlay. The atlas follows Scholem's range rather than a narrower guess, and does not print the per-letter planet and sign tables at all, because doing so would silently pick one contested recension over the others.

Source Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, Gershom Scholem