Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Baptism in the Holy Spirit

God and Divine Nature

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Baptism in the Holy Spirit names an experience Pentecostals hold as distinct from, and normally subsequent to, conversion itself: a definite empowering encounter with the Holy Spirit that equips a believer for bold witness and supernatural ministry. Classical Pentecostalism, following the pattern read out of the Acts of the Apostles, teaches that speaking in tongues is the initial physical evidence that the experience has occurred, a position that distinguishes Pentecostal denominations from the wider Charismatic and evangelical world that affirms Spirit-filled experience without requiring tongues as its proof. The doctrine gave the movement its name, since Pentecost in the book of Acts is the moment the apostles themselves were first filled with the Spirit and spoke in other tongues.

Facts
Structure
Structure
Classical Pentecostalism teaches that speaking in tongues is the initial physical evidence that the experience has occurred, which distinguishes Pentecostal denominations from the wider Charismatic and evangelical world that affirms Spirit-filled experience without requiring tongues as its proof. 1
Belief
Subject
Salvation and liberation 1
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
An experience distinct from, and normally subsequent to, conversion itself: a definite empowering encounter with the Holy Spirit that equips a believer for bold witness and supernatural ministry. 1
Origins
Held By
Pentecostalism, and in a broader form the Charismatic movement 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 1
Doctrinal Category
God and Divine Nature 1
Learn More
Azusa Street and the Doctrine of Initial Evidence

The doctrine has roots in the Holiness movement's search for a definite, datable experience of entire sanctification, but Pentecostalism gave it a new shape. Charles Parham, teaching at a small Bible school in Topeka, Kansas, concluded from the book of Acts around 1900 that speaking in tongues was the biblical sign that a believer had received Spirit baptism, and one of his students, Agnes Ozman, reportedly spoke in tongues on January 1, 1901, an event Pentecostals mark as an early confirmation of the teaching.

William J. Seymour, a Black preacher who had studied briefly under Parham, carried the teaching to Los Angeles and opened revival services on Azusa Street on April 9, 1906. The meetings ran for years, drew a famously interracial crowd unusual for the period, and sent participants back out across the country and abroad, planting the doctrine of Spirit baptism with tongues as evidence at the center of dozens of new denominations that trace their founding directly to the revival.

The doctrine of initial evidence, that tongues specifically, not merely some manifestation of the Spirit, marks the moment of Spirit baptism, became the line distinguishing classical Pentecostal denominations from the broader Charismatic renewal that later carried similar experiences into Catholic, Anglican and mainline Protestant churches without requiring tongues as proof.

A Second, Distinct Experience

Classical Pentecostal theology treats Spirit baptism as logically and normally chronologically distinct from conversion: a believer is first born again through faith in Christ, and then, often later and sometimes much later, receives a separate empowering baptism in the Holy Spirit, sought through prayer, often at a revival meeting or an altar service set aside for the purpose. This differs from most other Protestant theology, which locates the gift of the Spirit at conversion itself and does not expect or require a later, separate experience.

The practical effect has been to give Pentecostal worship a structure built around expectancy: services regularly include extended prayer specifically for people seeking Spirit baptism, testimony from those who have received it, and instruction in what the experience should look like. Believers who have not yet spoken in tongues are, in classical Pentecostal churches, understood to be seeking a real and attainable further gift rather than something already fully theirs.

The doctrine spread from its Pentecostal denominations into the Charismatic movement of the 1960s and 1970s, which carried Spirit baptism and the associated gifts into Catholic and mainline Protestant congregations, generally while relaxing the specific requirement that tongues alone serve as its evidence, a modification classical Pentecostal denominations have not generally accepted for themselves.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Affirmed By

Spirit baptism affirmed as an empowering experience distinct from and subsequent to conversion.

Belongs to Tradition

Baptism in the Holy Spirit, evidenced by speaking in tongues, is the tradition's defining and namesake doctrine, traced to the Azusa Street revival of 1906.

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.