In the Samaritan articles of faith Moses stands alone. He is not the first of a line but the whole of it, and the finality of what he received is the reason no prophetic book after the Torah could ever be scripture. The claim goes further than a rule about the canon. It fixes the shape of the religion around a single revelation, kept by a hereditary priesthood and read in an unbroken liturgical cycle, rather than around a developing tradition of interpretation with authorities in each generation. Samaritan writers describe the period after the settlement in the land as a turning away, in which the true sanctuary was hidden and the community entered a time of divine disfavour, and it is against that background that they look for a restorer rather than for a new prophet. The faith is usually summarised as a short list: one God, one prophet, one book, one holy place, and a day of reckoning still to come.
Facts
Structure
StructureMoses is not the first of a line but the whole of it, which is the reason no prophetic book after the Torah could ever be scripture. The faith is usually summarised as a short list: one God, one prophet, one book, one holy place, and a day of reckoning still to come. 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionDefined and binding within this tradition 1 Doctrinal CategoryRevelation, Covenant and Prophecy 1 Belief
SubjectRevelation and scripture 1 Learn More
The Tenth Commandment the Samaritan Torah Adds
The clearest textual expression of where Samaritan and Jewish scripture part company sits inside the Ten Commandments themselves. The Samaritan Pentateuch assembles material found scattered elsewhere in the Jewish text, commands to build an altar and offer sacrifice at the mountain God will choose, into a tenth commandment naming Mount Gerizim directly as that place, so that the instruction to worship there is read as coming from Moses's own hand at Sinai rather than as a later development. Everything else the doctrine holds about Moses as the sole and final prophet depends on treating this reading as original rather than as a Samaritan alteration, since a text that adds a commandment after the fact looks very different from a text preserving what Israel's own scripture displaced. Samaritans read the Jewish version, which numbers the commandments differently and omits the Gerizim clause, as the corrupted text, tampered with by a priesthood that had already relocated worship to Jerusalem. The dispute cannot be settled by appeal to either community's own manuscript, since each holds its own version to be Mosaic and the other's to be altered, and it is one of the oldest continuously argued textual questions in the history of biblical scholarship, still unresolved on manuscript evidence alone.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.