Phaladeepika, "the illuminator of results," is a classical Sanskrit treatise of Jyotisha, Vedic astrology, attributed to Mantreswara. It sets out the results, phala, of planetary combinations found in a birth chart, including the five great person combinations, the Pancha Mahapurusha yogas this atlas already treats individually, and ranks alongside the Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra and the Brihat Jataka among the tradition's significant classical works on natal astrology, a status the Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra's own entry already reflects by naming it directly.
Facts
Disputed
Era of CompositionMantreswara's own dates are unrecorded, and reference works place him anywhere from the thirteenth to the sixteenth century CE without agreement. Some editions favor an earlier compilation closer to the thirteenth century, others a later one closer to the sixteenth, and no manuscript or external reference fixes the question. The text remains in active use by practicing astrologers today, unusual for a work of such uncertain age, which has not resolved the dating dispute among historians of Indian astral literature such as David Pingree. Era of CompositionIts date of composition is unsettled; scholars have placed it anywhere from the thirteenth to the sixteenth century. 1 The Phaladeepika is a classical Sanskrit treatise on horoscopic astrology traditionally attributed to Mantreswara, but the period in which it was composed is not fixed by any external record. David Pingree's Jyotihsastra: Astral and Mathematical Literature (Otto Harrassowitz, 1981), part of the History of Indian Literature series and a scholarly survey of Sanskrit astral and mathematical texts, traces the textual history of works in this genre. The method is philological, placing a text within the wider tradition of jyotisha literature by comparing its technical content and its relationship to other datable astral texts it draws on or is drawn on by, since works in this genre typically name no external event that would fix a date directly. Because the Phaladeepika's own colophon supplies an author's name but no dated context, and its technique set overlaps with material from more than one period of the genre's development, the era of its composition is placed within a broad window rather than fixed to one century. Text
Literary Form Scholarship
Critical EditionModern editions typically print the Sanskrit text alongside a commentary, since many of its terse verses on planetary combinations are considered to need explanatory gloss to be usable by a practicing astrologer. 1 First PublishedThe work reached English language readers chiefly through translations produced in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the route by which its predictive techniques became familiar outside the Sanskrit commentarial tradition. 1 Sources
Textual NoteIts treatment of the five great person combinations, the Pancha Mahapurusha yogas, sits among a wider account of named planetary combinations and their predicted effects on a nativity. 1 Origins
Attributed Author / CompilerTraditionally attributed to Mantreswara. 1 Transmission
Manuscript TraditionTransmitted within the wider Sanskrit jyotisha manuscript tradition rather than through any single named witness. Like most classical astrological treatises it survives in multiple regional recensions, copied and recopied across centuries before modern printing fixed a standard text. 1 Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NotePracticing astrologers continue to consult it directly as a working reference rather than only as a historical document, unusually for a text of its age. That ongoing practical use, alongside its unsettled date, sets it apart from the largely retired grimoire literature of comparable age in the West. 1 Learn More
The Text Behind the Five Great Person Yogas
Every one of the five Pancha Mahapurusha yogas already documented on this atlas, Ruchaka for Mars, Bhadra for Mercury, Hamsa for Jupiter, Malavya for Venus and Shasha for Saturn, is a classification jyotisha inherited largely through texts like the Phaladeepika, attributed to the astrologer Mantreswara. Where the Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra lays out the foundational apparatus of the tradition, the nakshatras, the graha and the divisional charts, later manuals such as the Phaladeepika take that apparatus as settled and move on to systematic results: what a given placement of a given planet, in a given house or sign, is read to produce in the life of the person born under it. The Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra's own entry on this atlas names the Phaladeepika directly, describing it as one of the later manuals that assumes the earlier text's framework as already known, which is the ordinary relationship a foundational treatise has to the results literature that follows it.
The five great person combinations are a representative sample of exactly the kind of material the Phaladeepika systematizes. Each forms when one of the five non-luminous classical planets occupies its own sign or its sign of exaltation while positioned in one of the chart's angular houses, and each carries a named, detailed prediction: the physique, temperament and public standing said to follow from a Mars in Ruchaka, a Mercury in Bhadra, and so on for the remaining three. A reader who wants to know not simply that the five combinations exist, which the Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra and the Brihat Jataka both establish, but what a jyotisha manual actually claims one of them predicts in practice, is reading material of the kind the Phaladeepika is remembered for supplying in full.
A Text Whose Century Nobody Has Settled
Unlike a printed book, a classical Sanskrit treatise such as the Phaladeepika survives as a manuscript tradition, copied and recopied by hand across many centuries, and a text transmitted that way rarely carries a fixed, unambiguous date of composition the way a modern publication does. Colophons naming a scribe or a patron can date a single copy without dating the original composition behind it, verses attributed to a named author can be added or dropped between recensions, and later commentators sometimes rework the surrounding material enough that dating the commentary tradition and dating the base text become two separate problems. This is the ordinary condition of classical jyotisha literature, not a defect unique to this one book, and it is why a genre survey of the kind this atlas cites for the Phaladeepika treats textual dating as one of its central, recurring problems rather than a settled fact to be looked up.
The consequence for a reader is straightforward and worth stating plainly rather than papering over: this atlas records Mantreswara's authorship as the tradition's own settled attribution, but it does not assert a specific century for the work, because the scholarship it draws on does not agree on one. Proposals in the literature range across roughly three centuries, from as early as the thirteenth to as late as the sixteenth. Where the Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra's own entry on this atlas notes an open question about when that earlier, foundational text reached the form now studied, the Phaladeepika sits downstream of exactly the same kind of transmission history, and the honest position is to say so rather than to pick a number that no single source actually supports.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
The Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra's own textual-note fact names the Phaladeepika directly as a later manual assuming its framework as known.
Its treatment of the five great person combinations places it alongside this atlas's own Mahapurusha Yogas category.
A classical treatise of Vedic astrology.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.