Gunas
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 200 BCE to 200 CE
Rajas is one of the three gunas, or fundamental qualities, of Samkhya philosophy, an ancient school of Hindu thought whose classical formulation, the Samkhya Karika, dates to around the fourth or fifth century CE, though the concept of the three gunas appears earlier still in the Bhagavad Gita. It names the quality of activity, passion and movement, sitting between Sattva, the quality of clarity and balance, and Tamas, the quality of inertia and darkness, in a threefold classification the tradition holds underlies all of material nature, not only human temperament. In the Bhagavad Gita and later Hindu thought, Rajas is associated with desire, ambition and restless striving, valued for the energy it brings to action but considered, on its own, to bind a person to further action and further consequence rather than to liberation. Unlike Sattva or Tamas, whose associations are more clearly settled across the tradition, Rajas is regularly described as the quality that can tip toward either of the other two, making it the least stable of the three.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period200 BCE to 200 CE 1Tradition: Hinduism Origin Period350 to 450 CE 2Tradition: Samkhya Karika of Ishvarakrishna Origin PeriodOne of the three gunas of Samkhya philosophy, appearing already in the Bhagavad Gita by around 200 BCE and given its classical formulation in the Samkhya Karika of the fourth or fifth century CE. 2 Place of OriginThe Indian subcontinent. 2Tradition: Samkhya Karika of Ishvarakrishna Attributed Author / CompilerIshvarakrishna, who systematised in seventy-two verses doctrines the tradition ascribes to the legendary Kapila. 2Tradition: Samkhya Karika of Ishvarakrishna Origin of the NameGuna means a strand or thread of a rope, and only secondarily a quality. The three are strands twisted together to make nature, not qualities applied to it, and the rope image is the reason the doctrine holds that all three are present in everything. 2Tradition: Samkhya Karika of Ishvarakrishna LanguageSanskrit 2Tradition: Samkhya Karika of Ishvarakrishna Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceIn the Samkhyakarika rajas is the strand that is stimulating and mobile 2Tradition: Samkhya Karika of Ishvarakrishna Meaning in the Attesting SourceThe Bhagavad Gita treats rajas as the chief cause of bondage to action and its fruits: rajasic food, action and temperament are those marked by intensity, agitation and hunger for results. 1Tradition: Hinduism Meaning in the Attesting SourceThe principle of activity, without which nothing moves 2Tradition: Samkhya Karika of Ishvarakrishna Status
Status TodayLiving tradition, practised today 3 Learn More
Rajas, the Guna of Activity and Passion
Rajas is, in the Samkhya philosophy and the Bhagavad Gita, the second of the three gunas, the strand of activity, passion, movement and desire, the quality of energy, restlessness, ambition and craving that drives action and change. In the threefold analysis of nature it is the principle of motion and of the turning of the world, neither revealing like sattva nor concealing like tamas but impelling, the force behind striving, attachment and the ceaseless pursuit of ends.
The Bhagavad Gita characterises rajasic food, action and temperament as those marked by intensity, agitation and the hunger for results, and it identifies rajas as a chief cause of the bondage of the soul to action and its fruits. Yet rajas is necessary, for without it there is no movement at all; the teaching is not to eliminate it but to govern it, favouring the clarity of sattva while recognising that the settled tendency of nature is the interplay of all three. The doctrine is ancient and central to Hindu and yogic thought.
Sources Classical Samkhya: An Interpretation of Its History and MeaningGerald James Larson with Srimad-Bhagavad-Gita, English translation and commentarySwami Swarupananda
Rajas in Diet, Character and the Aim Beyond the Gunas
The Bhagavad Gita's seventeenth chapter extends the three gunas into a working classification of food, giving, speech and action, and rajasic food is described there as bitter, sour, salty or excessively hot, the kind that brings pain, grief and disease when taken to excess, favoured by those it says are driven by desire for results rather than by clarity. The same grid marks a gift given for gain, or expecting something in return, as rajasic rather than sattvic, extending the guna beyond metaphysics into everyday ethical judgement.
No substance or person is held to be purely rajasic; all three gunas are always present together, and rajas is generally treated as the quality that must be reduced, not eliminated outright, since some measure of activity and drive is needed to accomplish anything at all, including the disciplined practice aimed at increasing sattva in its place. Spiritual effort is itself, in this analysis, a rajasic act undertaken in service of a sattvic goal.
Popular treatments sometimes flatten rajas into a simple label for stress or ambition, dropping the doctrine that all three gunas coexist in every person and substance and that the aim is a shifting balance rather than the elimination of one guna in favour of a fixed, permanent other.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
1. Bhagavad Gita
Traditionally attributed to Vyasa, Trubner & Co., 1885Chapters 14 and 17-18, classifying temperament, action, food and knowledge by their predominant gunaView the Source 2. Classical Samkhya: An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning
Gerald James Larson, Motilal Banarsidass, 1979On the three gunas (sattva, rajas, tamas) as the constituent strands of prakriti in classical SamkhyaView the Source 3. An Introduction to Hinduism
Gavin Flood, Cambridge University Press, 1996on Samkhya categories in living Hindu thoughtView the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.