Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Historical Figures

Bohemond of Taranto

Rulers, Emperors & Monarchs

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A Norman nobleman of southern Italy, son of Robert Guiscard, who joined the First Crusade with a force of Normans from Sicily and Apulia. He played a leading role in the prolonged siege and capture of Antioch in 1098 and, against an earlier oath to restore conquered Byzantine territory, took the city for himself as Prince of Antioch, the first of the Crusader states to be founded. He later returned to Europe and led an unsuccessful invasion of Byzantine territory in 1107 to 1108 that ended in the Treaty of Devol, by which he held Antioch only as a Byzantine vassal for the rest of his life.

Facts
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
1054 to 1111 1
Office Held
Prince of Antioch, 1098 to 1111 (a Byzantine vassal from 1108). 1
Origins
Place of Origin
San Marco Argentano, in Calabria, southern Italy. 1
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Identity
Gender
Male 1
Learn More
A Norman Adventurer Takes a City He Swore to Give Away

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Bohemond of Taranto, a Norman nobleman of southern Italy and son of Robert Guiscard, joined the First Crusade with a force of Normans drawn from Sicily and Apulia, bringing to the expedition the same military energy his family had already used to carve out territory in southern Italy at Byzantine and Lombard expense. Born in San Marco Argentano, in Calabria, he arrived in the East as one of the crusade's most capable and ambitious commanders, a reputation the campaign at Antioch would soon confirm.

He played a leading role in the prolonged siege and eventual capture of Antioch in 1098, one of the hardest fought engagements of the entire crusade, a siege that dragged on for months before the city finally fell. Before the siege, Bohemond and the other crusade leaders had sworn an oath to restore any conquered Byzantine territory to the Byzantine Empire, the power under whose nominal authority the expedition had originally set out from Constantinople.

Bohemond broke that oath once Antioch fell, taking the city for himself as Prince of Antioch rather than returning it to Byzantine control. The result was the first of the Crusader states to be founded, an outcome that rewarded his role in the siege while directly contradicting the commitment he had made before it, a contradiction that would shape the rest of his career and eventually draw him back into open conflict with Byzantium itself.

A Failed Invasion Ends in Vassalage at the Treaty of Devol

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Having taken Antioch for himself against his own oath to restore it to Byzantine rule, Bohemond of Taranto later returned to Europe and raised a fresh army for a direct invasion of Byzantine territory, launched in 1107. Where the capture of Antioch had rewarded his crusade generalship, this second campaign turned that same ambition against the empire whose territory he had earlier promised to hand back, an open break with the power he had once nominally served.

The invasion failed. By 1108 Bohemond's forces were defeated, and the resulting settlement, the Treaty of Devol, bound him for the rest of his life to hold Antioch not as an independent prince but as a vassal of the Byzantine emperor, the very relationship of subordination his original oath had promised and his conquest of the city had then evaded for a decade. The treaty formally recorded terms Bohemond had spent ten years and a failed invasion trying to avoid.

Bohemond held the Principality of Antioch as that Byzantine vassal from 1108 until his death in 1111, closing out a career that had carried him from a broken oath at Antioch's capture, through a decade as an effectively independent prince, to formal subordination under the treaty his own failed invasion produced, a full turn from the ambition that had founded the principality in the first place.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Antioch, Cities

This source names Antioch directly: "He played a leading role in the prolonged siege and capture of Antioch in 1098 and, against an earlier oath to restore conquered Byzantine territory, took the city for himself as Prince of Antioch..."

Source God's War: A New History of the CrusadesChristopher Tyerman
Europe, Continents

This source names Europe directly: "He later returned to Europe and led an unsuccessful invasion of Byzantine territory in 1107 to 1108 that ended in the Treaty of Devol, by which he held Antioch only as a Byzantine vassal for the..."

Source God's War: A New History of the CrusadesChristopher Tyerman
Italy, Countries

This source names Italy directly: "A Norman nobleman of southern Italy, son of Robert Guiscard, who joined the First Crusade with a force of Normans from Sicily and Apulia."

Source God's War: A New History of the CrusadesChristopher Tyerman

Belongs to Tradition

Source God's War: A New History of the CrusadesChristopher Tyerman

Related To

Sources
1. God's War: A New History of the Crusades
Christopher Tyerman, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.