Home›Open Questions›Did the physical layout of the Duke buildings permit Hubert Pearce to observe the target cards during the Pearce-Pratt distance series?Open QuestionsDid the physical layout of the Duke buildings permit Hubert Pearce to observe the target cards during the Pearce-Pratt distance series?Citation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Did the physical layout of the Duke buildings permit Hubert Pearce to observe the target cards during the Pearce-Pratt distance series?." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/open-questions-index/did-the-physical-layout-of-the-duke-buildings-permit-hubert-pearce-to-observe-the-target-cards-during-the-pearce-pratt-distance-series.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Did the physical layout of the Duke buildings permit Hubert Pearce to observe the target cards during the Pearce-Pratt distance series?. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/open-questions-index/did-the-physical-layout-of-the-duke-buildings-permit-hubert-pearce-to-observe-the-target-cards-during-the-pearce-pratt-distance-seriesCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-did-the-physical-layout-of-the-duke-buil, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Did the physical layout of the Duke buildings permit Hubert Pearce to observe the target cards during the Pearce-Pratt distance series?}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/open-questions-index/did-the-physical-layout-of-the-duke-buildings-permit-hubert-pearce-to-observe-the-target-cards-during-the-pearce-pratt-distance-series}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXOpen QuestionCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Open QuestionC. E. M. Hansel examined the buildings in the 1960s and argued that a route existed by which the subject, unobserved in the library, could have reached a position from which the cards were visible. Rhine and Pratt disputed the sightlines, the timing, and whether such an absence would have gone unnoticed. Neither side conceded, and the buildings have since been altered, so the question can no longer be settled by inspection.What would resolve this Original architectural plans of the Social Sciences building and the campus library as they stood in 1933 and 1934, together with any contemporaneous record of Pearce's whereabouts during the sessions.OpenHistory of science; architectural history; archival research at Duke UniversityC. E. M. Hansel, ESP: A Scientific EvaluationCross-Tradition ConnectionsDiscipline NeededArchitectural History, Scholarly Disciplines Well-attested Source ESP: A Scientific EvaluationC. E. M. Hanseltier 1Archival Research, Scholarly Disciplines Well-attested Source ESP: A Scientific EvaluationC. E. M. Hanseltier 1History of Science, Scholarly Disciplines Well-attested Source ESP: A Scientific EvaluationC. E. M. Hanseltier 1Question OnThe Pearce-Pratt Distance Series, Studies Well-attested Source ESP: A Scientific EvaluationC. E. M. Hanseltier 1SourcesESP: A Scientific Evaluationtier 1C. E. M. Hansel, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1966View the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year