Prayers
Deist Prayer Tradition
Modern Movement Prayers
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 17th to 18th century Europe
Prayer within Deism is a contested practice rather than a body of texts. Deism, as historically formulated in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, generally held that God set the universe in motion according to rational, discoverable laws and does not intervene through miracle or revelation, which left many Deist thinkers doubtful of petitionary prayer asking God to alter the ordinary course of events. Historical Deists varied considerably on the question: some retained forms of reverent address to God as a rational duty of gratitude, while others rejected the efficacy of prayer outright. What the tradition holds, then, is an argument about whether prayer makes sense at all rather than a shared liturgy, and any one text offered as a Deist prayer would speak for a side of that argument rather than for the tradition.
Facts
Origins
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account17th to 18th century Europe 1 Attributed Author / CompilerSourced to the subject's own accountEdward Herbert, 1st Baron Herbert of Cherbury, whose 1624 De Veritate is generally treated as the founding statement of English deism and the starting point for the tradition's later arguments about the standing of prayer. 1 Use
What It Is Used ForSourced to the subject's own accountContemplative: repeated to still or transform the mind 1 Learn More
A Philosophy More Than a Church
Deism developed during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as a philosophical movement rather than as an organized church with its own clergy, congregations or fixed liturgy, associated with figures including Voltaire in France and Thomas Paine and, more ambiguously, several of the American founding generation, and it accordingly never developed a shared prayer tradition comparable to the organized religions catalogued elsewhere in this atlas, since its core commitment, that God's existence and character can be known through reason and observation of nature rather than through revealed scripture or church authority, left considerable room for individual Deist thinkers to reach quite different conclusions about whether, or how, prayer made sense at all.
Some historical Deists retained a form of reverent address to God as a rational expression of gratitude for an orderly, well-designed universe, while others, taking the reasoning about a non-intervening creator further, argued that petitionary prayer asking God to alter events was simply incoherent given Deism's premise that God does not intervene in the world's ordinary operation after creation. Several prominent members of the American founding generation, including Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, expressed views commonly described as broadly Deist in character, though historians caution that their specific personal positions on prayer and religious practice varied considerably and often remained more nuanced or ambiguous than the simple Deist label alone would suggest.
Why No Single Deist Prayer Could Represent the Movement
Because historical Deism was never organized around a shared scripture, ordained clergy or congregational structure, individual Deist thinkers expressed their own personal views on prayer through their own individually authored philosophical and religious writing rather than through any text intended for shared communal recitation, meaning presenting any specific historical Deist author's personal reflection on prayer as representative of Deism generally would misrepresent just how individually varied Deist positions on the question actually were.
Contemporary self-identified Deists, a considerably smaller and less historically prominent group than in the eighteenth century, similarly tend to hold individually developed views on prayer's appropriateness and meaning rather than following any shared organizational practice, since modern Deism, like its historical predecessor, remains fundamentally a philosophical stance about how God can be known rather than an organized religious community with congregational life. This entry accordingly records Deism's general character and the specific reason, its historical and philosophical individualism, that no single representative prayer text can be offered in its place.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.