Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Religious Symbols

Square

Notation

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 200 BCE to 200 CE

The square is an angular separation of ninety degrees, three signs apart, and its glyph is simply a small square, the regular quadrilateral standing for the right angle that a ninety-degree division inscribes in the circle. It is one of the four classical aspects of the Ptolemaic tradition. Its difficult reputation follows from the geometry: signs ninety degrees apart share the same mode, cardinal, fixed or mutable, but are of opposite polarity and of elements traditionally reckoned incompatible, so the two bodies act at the same tempo and in the same manner while pulling in directions that cannot both be satisfied. It is read as the aspect of friction, obstruction and internal conflict, and equally, in most modern practice, as the aspect that generates drive, since the tension it describes must be worked at and cannot be ignored.

Facts
Form
Type of Symbol
Mathematical or scribal notation 1
Geometric Form
A plain open square. 2
Origins
Origin Period
200 BCE to 200 CE 2
Place of Origin
The Hellenistic Greco-Roman world. 1
Learn More
An Aspect

A square is the aspect of ninety degrees, one of the five classical aspects, traditionally counted among the tense or challenging relationships between two bodies. It is one of the four configurations Ptolemy recognised as a true aspect in the Tetrabiblos, the ninety-degree arc being narrow enough that the two bodies plainly behold one another yet share none of the underlying compatibility that softens the trine or the sextile; on his reasoning the elements and qualities governing bodies a quarter of the circle apart are actively opposed, which is why the square carries its difficult reputation rather than a neutral one. The angle corresponds to the fourfold division of the circle and to the interior angle of the square itself, a coincidence of geometry and name that made the aspect easy to picture and to draw from the earliest sources.

As with the trine and the opposition, the square's standing as a genuine aspect, rather than a synodos-like fusion or a mere aversion, was never in question in the ancient sources; the debate over which configurations counted as true aspects concerned the conjunction and the intermediate distances, not this one. The square shares this settled status with the trine, sextile and opposition, and its later reputation for difficulty says nothing about its standing as a genuine aspect; on Ptolemy's own account a square is every bit as much a real relationship between two bodies as a trine, only one governed by qualities and elements that work against each other rather than together.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Symbol Of

Square, Aspects

The symbol's own cited description identifies its glyph as that of this astrological aspect.

Source A History of Western AstrologyNicholas Campion
Sources
1. A History of Western Astrology
Nicholas Campion, Continuum, 2009On astrological chart notationView the Source
2. Tetrabiblos
Claudius Ptolemy, W. Foulsham, 1900On the configurations (aspects) of the classical schemeView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.