Scripture Portions
Ezra-Nehemiah
Also Known As Ezra · NehemiahOriginal Term Ezra-Nechemyah (Hebrew)
Tanakh
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
One book in the Jewish canon, it recounts the return from Babylon under Cyrus's decree, the rebuilding of the temple and of Jerusalem's wall, and the public reading of the Torah by Ezra the scribe, a founding scene of Judaism as a religion of the book.
Facts
Origins
Era of CompositionNarrated events span c. 538 to 420 BCE, from the Persian-authorized return from Babylonian exile through the rebuilding of Jerusalem's walls; composition likely completed by the late 4th century BCE 2 LanguageBiblical Hebrew and Aramaic 1 Biblical Hebrew with substantial Aramaic sections, chiefly quoted Persian-period administrative correspondence Attributed Author / CompilerThe scribe Ezra, per the Babylonian Talmud (Bava Batra 15a), which credits him with the genealogies down to his own time and holds Nehemiah completed the rest; the book incorporates first person memoir material explicitly attributed within the text to both Ezra and Nehemiah 3 Identity
Position in the CanonTenth of the Ketuvim, Ezra and Nehemiah counted as one book. 1Tradition: Judaism Position in the CanonTwelfth book of the Christian Old Testament, Ezra and Nehemiah counted as one book. 1Tradition: Christianity Status
Canonical StatusA single book in the Hebrew canon; Christian tradition, following the Greek and Latin Bibles, divides it into separate books of Ezra and Nehemiah 1 Learn More
Rebuilding a Temple, Then Rebuilding a Wall
Ezra-Nehemiah narrates the practical work of restoration after the Babylonian exile, once the Persian king Cyrus authorizes the exiled Judeans to return, in two connected but distinct phases: Ezra's portion covers the return under Persian authorization, the rebuilding of the Jerusalem Temple amid local opposition, and, in its later chapters, Ezra's own arrival as a scribe commissioned to teach and enforce the Torah, including his sharply controversial demand that Israelite men who had married foreign women during the exile divorce them to preserve the community's religious identity.
Nehemiah's portion, some years later, covers his mission as a Persian court official granted leave to rebuild Jerusalem's ruined walls despite sustained local sabotage and threats, completed, the book says, in just fifty two days, followed by a public reading of the Torah led by Ezra that moves the assembled community to tears and a covenant renewal. The book preserves genuine official Persian-period documents in Aramaic, royal decrees and administrative correspondence, quoted directly within the narrative, giving historians rare documentary-style material alongside the surrounding first person memoir sections in which both Ezra and Nehemiah speak in their own voice about their work and their frustrations with the community's resistance.
Memoir, Document, and a Later Editor's Hand
Ezra-Nehemiah's composite structure is unusually visible on the page itself: large sections shift into first person, "I, Ezra" and "I, Nehemiah," material scholars call the Ezra Memoir and the Nehemiah Memoir, interwoven with third person narrative and quoted official Persian documents in Aramaic, giving the book a layered, documentary quality distinct from the smoother continuous prose of Samuel or Kings. Jewish tradition credits Ezra with substantial authorship, extending in the Talmud to a claim that he also compiled the closely related book of Chronicles, a connection some earlier modern scholars accepted as evidence of a single "Chronicler" responsible for both works, though this once-dominant theory is now more contested, with a growing number of scholars treating Ezra-Nehemiah and Chronicles as related but ultimately separate compositions from different hands or periods.
The book's account of Ezra's demand that Israelite men divorce foreign wives remains one of its most debated passages, read by some as a necessary measure protecting a fragile post-exilic community's religious survival and by others as a harshly exclusionary policy the roughly contemporary book of Ruth may have been composed in part to argue against, a genuine and long-recognized tension between two biblical books addressing the same underlying question of who belongs to the covenant community.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Contained In
Originates in Language
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.