Scripture Portions
Masei
Also Known As Mas'ei · MasaiOriginal Term masei (Hebrew, the journeys of)
Torah
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The book ends with an itinerary: forty-two encampments listed in order, a route that reads as bare geography until one notices that the text is preserving the record of a generation that did not arrive. The boundaries of the land are then drawn, and the cities of refuge are established, six towns where a person who killed without intent may flee from the blood redeemer and live until the death of the high priest, which is the Torah's attempt to interrupt the cycle of vengeance with an institution. The distinction it draws between intentional and accidental killing is the foundation of Jewish criminal law on homicide. Numbers closes by returning to Zelophehad's daughters and constraining whom they may marry.
Facts
Identity
Position in the Canon Canonical Reference Reckoning
Date RuleRead combined with Matot in a common year and separately in a leap year. 1 Learn More
Journeys: The Stages and the Cities of Refuge
In the synagogue the Torah is read aloud in a fixed annual cycle of fifty-four weekly portions (parashiyot), one each Shabbat morning, with certain adjacent portions doubled in ordinary years so the sequence fits the calendar. Each portion is named for a distinctive word near its opening and is paired with a haftarah, a reading from the Prophets. The cycle closes and restarts on Simchat Torah. Masei ('Journeys', Numbers 33:1-36:13) reviews the forty-two encampments of the wilderness journey, sets the boundaries of the promised land, designates the cities of refuge for the unintentional killer, and resolves the inheritance of Zelophehad's daughters. As the close of Numbers it is read with the cry of chazak.
The list of forty-two encampments across the wilderness years (Numbers 33:1-49) is read by commentators, including a comparison attributed to Ramban, as functioning like a travel log whose primary purpose is less geographical precision than theological testimony, a written record proving that Israel's decades of wandering, however aimless it must have felt at the time, in fact followed a deliberate, divinely tracked path from Egypt to the plains of Moab. The designation of six cities of refuge, three on each side of the Jordan, to which one who kills unintentionally may flee from the blood-avenger (Numbers 35:9-34), is read by classical commentary as the Torah's mechanism for distinguishing accidental killing from murder without leaving the matter to private vengeance, requiring the unintentional killer to remain in the city until the death of the serving high priest.
One Case, Closed Two Portions Later
Masei closes the book of Numbers with a final ruling on Zelophehad's daughters, only a few chapters after Pinchas first raised their claim: Numbers 36 requires that daughters who inherit land in the absence of a brother marry within their own father's tribe, so that a woman's inherited land will not transfer to a different tribe's territory through her marriage, since land already returns to its original family at the jubilee but is understood to follow marriage in the meantime. Commentators read the ruling as the Torah's own record of a legal principle being tested, extended and then further refined once its wider consequences for tribal landholding became apparent, worked out across three separate weekly portions rather than settled in a single pronouncement.
Source critics attribute the closing genealogical and administrative material of Masei, including its detailed itinerary and its careful attention to precise tribal boundaries and land allocation, to the Priestly source, consistent with the same interest in ordered, documented process visible throughout the census and inheritance material earlier in Numbers. As the final portion of Numbers, Masei ends the book not with narrative resolution but with law, a structure some literary critics read as reflecting the book's overall character as an administrative record of a generation preparing to enter the land rather than a conventionally plotted story with a dramatic close.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Fixed liturgical pairing: this haftarah is read alongside this parashah.
Contained In
Originates in Language
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.