Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scripture Portions

Yashts

Also Known As HymnsOriginal Term Yasht (Avestan, hymn of praise)
Avesta

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Twenty one hymns to individual divinities, among them Mithra, Anahita, Tishtrya, Verethraghna and the fravashis, the guardian spirits. They preserve a great share of the oldest Iranian myth in Younger Avestan verse.

Facts
Identity
Parent Work
Avesta 1
Position in the Canon
One of the five sections of the Avesta, a set of hymns to individual divinities standing apart from the Yasna, Visperad and Vendidad liturgical core. 1
Origins
Language
Avestan 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Anonymous priestly composition of uneven age; a Younger Avestan surface can carry much older material underneath 2
Text
Literary Form
Twenty one hymns of praise, each addressed to a single yazata, a venerated being 1
Structure
Structure
Named for their subject: the Mihr Yasht for Mithra, the Aban Yasht for the waters and Anahita, the Bahram Yasht for Verethragna 1
Learn More
Twenty One Hymns To Twenty One Beings

The Yashts are a set of twenty one hymns, each addressed to a single yazata, a being worthy of veneration in the Zoroastrian system, and together they are the most narratively vivid part of the Avesta. Where the Yasna is defined by ritual function and the Vendidad by legal procedure, the Yashts read as praise poetry with embedded myth: they describe the deeds, appearance and power of their subject, and several preserve stories found nowhere else in the surviving Avesta.

The best known examples include the Mihr Yasht, addressed to Mithra as a guardian of covenants and oaths, the Aban Yasht, addressed to the waters and to the goddess Anahita, and the Bahram Yasht, addressed to Verethragna, a being associated with victory. Because each Yasht was composed and transmitted somewhat independently before being gathered into a single collection, they vary considerably in length, poetic quality and apparent age, and a few are thought to preserve pre-Zoroastrian material that was reworked to fit the tradition's theology rather than composed fresh within it.

Individual Yashts remain in active devotional use, recited on the calendar day associated with their yazata, which keeps them closer to living practice than some of the Avesta's more purely liturgical material.

Uneven Age Under A Uniform Surface

All the Yashts as they survive are in Younger Avestan, but that shared surface language conceals considerable variation in underlying age. Specialists studying meter, vocabulary and mythic content have argued that several Yashts, the Mihr Yasht and Aban Yasht prominent among them, carry material that predates the systematic form Zoroastrianism took under the Achaemenid and Sasanian empires, reshaped and given a Zoroastrian theological frame without fully erasing the older layer beneath it.

That unevenness makes the Yashts a frequent point of comparison for scholars studying the relationship between Zoroastrianism and the wider Indo-Iranian religious world it emerged from, since figures such as Mithra and Anahita have close counterparts and cognates elsewhere in Iranian and Indian tradition. The Yashts were transmitted orally for a very long period before being fixed in the Avestan alphabet devised under the Sasanians, and like the rest of the Avesta they were later accompanied by a Pahlavi Zand for priests who no longer read Avestan as a living language.

The Farvardin Yasht, honoring the Fravashis, the guardian spirits of the dead, is recited during the Zoroastrian new year period and remains among the most widely used of the collection in contemporary practice, which shows how individual Yashts keep a devotional life distinct from the set as a whole.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Contained In

Source A History of ZoroastrianismMary Boyce

Originates in Language

Avestan, Languages
Source Textual Sources for the Study of ZoroastrianismMary Boyce (ed. and trans.)
Sources
1. A History of Zoroastrianism
Mary Boyce, Brill, 1989View the Source
2. Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Mary Boyce (ed. and trans.), Manchester University Press, 1984View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.