Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Shem Angels

Haziel

HAH-zee-el
Forgiveness and Mercy

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1050 to 1105

Haziel is the 9th of the seventy-two angels of the Shem ha-Mephorash, the divided Name of God. The seventy-two names are drawn from three consecutive verses of Exodus (14:19, 14:20, 14:21), each exactly seventy-two Hebrew letters long; taking verse 19 forward, verse 20 in reverse, and verse 21 forward one letter at a time yields seventy-two three-letter roots, and to each is added the suffix -EL (God), invoking the aspect of God on the Pillar of Severity. This angel governs 10 to 15 degrees of Taurus, the second decan of the sign, ruled in the Chaldean order by the Moon; in the Golden Dawn tarot this decan answers to the Six of Pentacles. In the traditional arrangement of the Name it belongs to the choir of the Cherubim under the archangel Raziel, the octad attributed to Chokmah (Wisdom). Its sphere of influence is forgiveness and mercy. The verse Psalm 25:6 is traditionally recited to invoke its aid.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1050 to 1105 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Origin Period
1150 to 1200 2Tradition: Sefer ha-Bahir
Origin Period
1270 to 1300 3Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah
Origin Period
1517 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Place of Origin
German Rhineland for Reuchlin's Latin treatment 5
Place of Origin
Northern France for Rashi's comment 5
Place of Origin
Provence and Languedoc for the Bahir; Castile for the Zohar 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
Derivation is Jewish and medieval; the angelology is Christian Kabbalah 4
Attributed Author / Compiler
Johann Reuchlin (1455-1522), German Hebraist, De Arte Cabalistica, 1517 4
Attributed Author / Compiler
No author for the derivation 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Rashi (d. 1105) describes the names as already marked out, not found 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
Treats the seventy-two groups as angel names, adds -el/-yah suffixes 4
Origin of the Name
Constructed from Exodus 14:19-21, each verse seventy-two letters 6
Origin of the Name
Nothing in Exodus prescribes this reading 6
Origin of the Name
Read boustrophedon: forward, reversed, forward, one letter each 6
Origin of the Name
Shem ha-Mephorash first meant the Tetragrammaton, not seventy-two names 7
Origin of the Name
Talmud discusses twelve- and forty-two-letter names, not this derivation 7
Language
Biblical Hebrew 6
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Gives no angel a quality, degree span, psalm, planet or card 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Names the three adjacent verses of Beshallach, and no more 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Qualities, degrees, psalms and zodiac signs are not in his list 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Rashi's comment on Sukkah 45a is the earliest clear description 1Tradition: Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Reuchlin's list gives the names and the two pronounceable suffixes 4Tradition: De Arte Cabalistica (Johann Reuchlin, 1517)
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
A modern system making claims scholarship never entertained; it never held scholarly standing 1
Derivation first attested by Rashi (d. 1105)
Learn More
Nine Choirs of Eight

The seventy-two are conventionally arranged in nine groups of eight, each group assigned to a choir of angels, to a sephirah and to a governing archangel. The arithmetic is exact and the structure is elegant. Its parts come from three different places.

The nine choirs are from The Celestial Hierarchy, a Greek Christian treatise written around the year 500 under the name of Dionysius the Areopagite, the Athenian convert mentioned in Acts. The attribution is false and has been known to be false since the Renaissance, Isaac Casaubon's critical work of 1614 is part of the same movement that unmasked it, but the text is a genuine and important piece of late antique Christian Neoplatonism. It sets out three triads: Seraphim, Cherubim and Thrones; Dominions, Virtues and Powers; Principalities, Archangels and Angels.

The sephiroth are the ten emanations of Kabbalistic theosophy, systematised in the Zohar and in the literature around it. There are ten of them, not nine, so the mapping onto the choirs requires an adjustment, usually by treating Kether and Chokmah differently or by omitting Malkuth from the scheme.

The archangels are a further layer, drawn from Jewish angelological sources of varying date, in which Metatron, Raziel, Tzaphkiel, Tzadkiel, Khamael, Michael, Haniel, Raphael and Gabriel are assigned to the sephiroth.

Overlaying the three and dividing seventy-two by nine to get eight is Christian Kabbalah at work. It is a genuine tradition with a real history, and its result is coherent. But no one before the sixteenth century could have stated it, because two of its three components had never been brought into contact before then.

Mercy, and the Vocabulary of the Attributes

Haziel is assigned forgiveness and mercy. Reading across all seventy-two attributions, the vocabulary they are drawn from turns out to be narrow and revealing.

The attributes cluster into a small number of fields. There is healing and health. There is protection and defence. There is knowledge, memory and learning. There is love, friendship, loyalty and reconciliation. There is justice, truth and integrity. There is prosperity, abundance and success. There is courage, strength and resilience. There is spiritual growth, elevation and enlightenment. Between them these cover almost the whole list, and several attributions differ from one another only in wording.

That narrowness is informative. A set of seventy-two distinct offices, if independently derived, would be expected to include specific and odd ones, the Goetia's catalogue, by contrast, offers understanding the speech of birds, making waters stormy and building towers. The Shem attributions have nothing of that kind. They are uniformly benign, uniformly abstract, and phrased in a register that would not be out of place in a modern book of daily affirmations.

The reason is the transmission. The attributes reach English through nineteenth and twentieth-century French occult writing, itself working within a devotional idiom, and then through late twentieth-century popular publishing that smoothed them further. Each stage moved the vocabulary toward the general and the positive.

A reader who wants to know what the seventy-two were originally for will not learn it from the attribute list. That list describes what the system has become. Its earlier layers, a technique for dividing the divine name, and a Renaissance angelology built on it, had different concerns entirely.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Originates in Language

Source The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)Anonymous (multiple authors)
Sources
1. Rashi's commentary on the Babylonian Talmud
Shlomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)Sukkah 45aView the Source
2. Sefer ha-Bahir (The Book of Illumination)
Anonymousthe sections working with the seventy-two-fold nameView the Source
3. The Zohar
Traditionally attributed to Moses de LeonPassim
Quote, Passim
The sephiroth as systematised in the Zoharic literature, onto which the nine choirs are mapped.
View the Source
4. De Arte Cabalistica (On the Art of Kabbalah)
Johann Reuchlin, Abaris Books, 1517the treatment of the seventy-two three-letter groups as the names of angelsView the Source
5. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism
Gershom Scholem, Schocken Books, 1961the chapters on the Bahir and on the ZoharView the Source
6. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
Anonymous (multiple authors)Exodus 14:19-21View the Source
7. The Babylonian Talmud
Anonymous (multiple authors), Soncino Press, 1935Kiddushin 71aView the Source
The Celestial Hierarchy
Pseudo-Dionysius the AreopagiteChapters 6-9
Quote, Chapters 6-9
Seraphim, Cherubim and Thrones; Dominions, Virtues and Powers; Principalities, Archangels and Angels.
View the Source
De rebus sacris et ecclesiasticis exercitationes XVI
Isaac Casaubon, John Bill, 1614Passim
Quote, Passim
Casaubon's critical work of 1614, part of the movement that established the pseudonymity of the Dionysian corpus and redated the Hermetica.

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.