Mogobe B. Ramose's African Philosophy Through Ubuntu is a scholarly philosophical work by a leading African philosopher arguing for ubuntu, the southern African ethical concept of interconnected personhood, as a substantive philosophical framework in its own right rather than merely a cultural curiosity to be studied from outside African thought. Ramose's authority rests on his standing as an academic philosopher writing from within the tradition he articulates, combining philosophical argument with linguistic analysis of the concept's Nguni and Sotho-Tswana roots. As an argument for ubuntu's philosophical seriousness and applicability, including to law and politics, it represents one influential and widely cited position within African philosophy, a still-developing field where other African philosophers continue to debate how ubuntu should be systematized and applied.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Mogobe B. Ramose's African Philosophy Through Ubuntu is a scholarly philosophical work by a recognized academic philosopher writing from within the tradition he articulates, treated at the top tier as academic scholarship combining philosophical argument with linguistic analysis. NotesMogobe Ramose's philosophical study of ubuntu as a southern African ethical and metaphysical concept, written by an African philosopher. Use for established facts about ubuntu as a philosophical concept; a philosophical argument grounded in southern African thought, not an ethnographic survey of deities such as Roog or Nyame across different African traditions, which needs a source specific to each.
Citation
AuthorMogobe B. Ramose
PublisherMond Books
Publication Year1999
Source Typebook
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Religious Roles & Titles, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Deities, 2 claims: 2 general references.
- Doctrines, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.