Robert Barclay was an early Quaker theologian, and this 1676 work, first written in Latin and then English, is his own systematic defense of Quaker belief, covering the doctrine of the Inner Light and Quaker objections to outward sacraments and a paid clergy. As Barclay's own primary statement it is the standard text cited for what early Quakerism actually taught in systematic form, at a time when most Quaker writing was occasional and polemical rather than organized theology. Its limit is that it represents one articulate voice's systematic case for the movement at one moment in its formation, not a survey of the diversity within early Quakerism or an account of how Quaker theology developed afterward, so a claim about later Quaker practice needs a more recent source.
Facts
Citation
AuthorRobert Barclay
PublisherHarvey and Darton
This is an 1822 printing; Barclay's Apology was first published in 1678. Publication Year1676
URLhttps://archive.org/details/barclaysapologyf00barc
Source Typeprimary-text
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Robert Barclay's 1678 Apology is the Religious Society of Friends' own standard systematic statement of Quaker theology, issued through the established London publishing house Harvey and Darton, treated at the top tier as that primary doctrinal record. NotesThe classic systematic statement of early Quaker belief.
Claims Backed By This Source (30 claims)
This source backs 30 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 2 rejected Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Doctrines, 10 claims: 2 holds, 2 rejected Here, 1 held Differently, 5 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Denominations, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.