Sources
Angkor (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Wikipedia's article on Angkor, consulted 2026-08-12.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Reliability tier 3: a continuously community-edited tertiary reference with no formal peer review process, suitable for citable, checkable factual claims but not treated as authoritative on genuinely contested points. NotesWikipedia's article on Angkor, consulted 2026-08-12. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication, useful here for laying out the live historians' debate over Theravada Buddhism's role in Angkor's fourteenth and fifteenth century decline, naming Coedes's own causal argument alongside the competing military and climate explanations rather than picking a side.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angkor
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Angkor directly: "Wikipedia's article on Angkor, consulted 2026-08-12."
Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)
This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Doctrines, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.