Robert K. Englund's Archaic Administrative Texts from Uruk is a specialist scholarly edition of some of the earliest known written texts, proto-cuneiform administrative tablets from the Uruk IV period, prepared by one of the foremost living authorities on early Mesopotamian writing and administration. Its authority rests on direct philological and archaeological command of an extraordinarily difficult corpus, texts that predate fully developed cuneiform and remain only partially deciphered even by specialists. As a technical edition aimed at cuneiform scholars, it is authoritative on the texts' administrative content, largely records of goods and labor rather than religious material, and it is properly read as primary evidence for early Mesopotamian bureaucracy and economy rather than as a source for early Mesopotamian religious belief specifically.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Robert K. Englund's edition, published for the Deutsches Archaologisches Institut, is a specialist scholarly edition by one of the foremost living authorities on early Mesopotamian writing, treated at the top tier as direct philological command of an extraordinarily difficult primary corpus. NotesScholarly critical edition of the earliest archaic administrative texts from Uruk.
Citation
AuthorRobert K. Englund
PublisherGebr. Mann Verlag, for the Deutsches Archaologisches Institut
Publication Year1994
Source TypeCritical edition
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Mesopotamians directly: "Robert K. Englund's Archaic Administrative Texts from Uruk is a specialist scholarly edition of some of the earliest known written texts, proto-cuneiform administrative tablets from the Uruk IV..."
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)
This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Studies, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Sacred Sites, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.