Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Archaische Texte aus Uruk V: Archaic Administrative Texts from Uruk, the Early Campaigns

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Robert K. Englund's Archaic Administrative Texts from Uruk is a specialist scholarly edition of some of the earliest known written texts, proto-cuneiform administrative tablets from the Uruk IV period, prepared by one of the foremost living authorities on early Mesopotamian writing and administration. Its authority rests on direct philological and archaeological command of an extraordinarily difficult corpus, texts that predate fully developed cuneiform and remain only partially deciphered even by specialists. As a technical edition aimed at cuneiform scholars, it is authoritative on the texts' administrative content, largely records of goods and labor rather than religious material, and it is properly read as primary evidence for early Mesopotamian bureaucracy and economy rather than as a source for early Mesopotamian religious belief specifically.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Robert K. Englund's edition, published for the Deutsches Archaologisches Institut, is a specialist scholarly edition by one of the foremost living authorities on early Mesopotamian writing, treated at the top tier as direct philological command of an extraordinarily difficult primary corpus.
Notes
Scholarly critical edition of the earliest archaic administrative texts from Uruk.
Citation
Author
Robert K. Englund
Publisher
Gebr. Mann Verlag, for the Deutsches Archaologisches Institut
Publication Year
1994
Source Type
Critical edition
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Mesopotamians directly: "Robert K. Englund's Archaic Administrative Texts from Uruk is a specialist scholarly edition of some of the earliest known written texts, proto-cuneiform administrative tablets from the Uruk IV..."

Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)

This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Studies, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Sacred Sites, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.