Sources
Asceticism
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Vincent L. Wimbush and Richard Valantasis edited this Oxford University Press volume, an academic collection drawn from a 1993 New York conference bringing together scholars of Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Indian and Zoroastrian ascetic practice. Its strength is the influence of its collective argument, the volume is widely credited with displacing the older reading of asceticism as simple world denial in favor of understanding ascetic practice as the active formation of a self, a reframing that has shaped subsequent scholarship across these traditions. Its limit, as with any large edited volume, is that individual chapters vary in depth and approach by contributor and tradition, so a claim about asceticism within one specific tradition covered here is best checked against that chapter directly rather than the volume's general thesis alone.
Facts
Citation
AuthorVincent L. Wimbush and Richard Valantasis (eds.)
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication Year1995
URLhttps://archive.org/details/asceticism0000unse
Source TypeEdited volume
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A scholarly edited volume from a university press collecting Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Indian and Zoroastrian material on asceticism. NotesPapers from the 1993 New York conference; Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Indian and Zoroastrian material. The volume that displaced the older world-denial reading of asceticism in favour of asceticism as the formation of a self.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names New York directly: "academic collection drawn from a 1993 New York conference bringing together scholars of Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Indian and Zoroastrian ascetic practice."
Source AsceticismVincent L. Wimbush and Richard Valantasis (eds.) Claims Backed By This Source (39 claims)
This source backs 39 claims across the atlas. As facts: 26 well-attested. As cited relationships: 10 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Disciplines, 13 claims: 3 well-attested, 9 holds, 1 general references.
- Religious Roles & Titles, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
- Subcategories, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.