Miranda Shaw is a scholar of Buddhist studies, and this Princeton University Press book is her academic survey of the goddess figures of Indian and Himalayan Buddhism, examining figures such as Tara against the wider Mahayana tradition's attitudes toward women practitioners. Its strength is a specific and debated argument, that motherhood and female agency are more central to how these goddess figures were conceived than earlier, more male centered scholarship recognized, made through close reading of Sanskrit and Tibetan primary sources rather than general survey alone. Its limit is that it is an argument as much as a survey, so where Shaw's specific interpretive claims are contested by other Buddhist studies scholars, a reader should check the wider secondary literature rather than treat this book's reading as the field's settled consensus.
Facts
Citation
AuthorMiranda Shaw
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication Year2006
URLhttps://archive.org/details/buddhistgoddesse00shaw
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Miranda Shaw's Princeton University Press monograph reading the Buddhist goddess Tara's cult against Mahayana attitudes toward women practitioners in sixth century India. NotesPublisher left NULL: not verified. Shaw argues motherhood is central to the conception of Tara and reads her against Mahayana attitudes to women practitioners in sixth-century India.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Tara, Deities This source names Tara directly: "Buddhism, examining figures such as Tara against the wider Mahayana tradition's attitudes toward women practitioners."
Claims Backed By This Source (60 claims)
This source backs 60 claims across the atlas. As facts: 45 well-attested. As cited relationships: 6 holds. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Deities, 20 claims: 10 well-attested, 4 holds, 6 general references.
- Hymns & Liturgical Texts, 12 claims: 11 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Mantras, 12 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.