Ronny Reich, an Israeli archaeologist who has published extensively on Second Temple period Jerusalem, wrote this article for Biblical Archaeology Review reading and discussing the Aramaic inscriptions on a set of ossuaries, bone boxes, bearing the name Caiaphas, found in a Jerusalem tomb, and considering their possible identification with the high priest of that name known from the Gospels. The magazine is a semi popular publication aimed at a general educated readership rather than a peer reviewed academic journal, but it is edited with input from working archaeologists and is a standard venue where field reports reach a wider audience before or alongside fuller academic publication. Its limit is exactly that intermediate status, useful for the inscriptional reading and the discovery's context, while the specific identification with the Gospel high priest remains a plausible but not certain inference that the article itself treats as a possibility rather than a proof.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Ronny Reich's article in Biblical Archaeology Review is written by an Israeli archaeologist who has published extensively on Second Temple period Jerusalem, the middle tier reflecting a specialist trade magazine rather than a peer reviewed journal, notwithstanding the author's own genuine excavation expertise. NotesReads the inscriptions and discusses the identification with the high priest Caiaphas of the Gospels.
Citation
AuthorRonny Reich
PublisherBiblical Archaeology Review
Publication Year1992
Source Typemagazine
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Caiaphas directly: "bone boxes, bearing the name Caiaphas, found in a Jerusalem tomb, and considering their possible identification with the high priest of that name known from the Gospels."
This source names Jerusalem directly: "extensively on Second Temple period Jerusalem, wrote this article for Biblical Archaeology Review reading and discussing the Aramaic inscriptions on a set of ossuaries, bone boxes, bearing the name..."
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)
This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Artifacts & Relics, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.