Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing at Stanford Research Institute

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Harold E. Puthoff was a physicist who co-directed the CIA-funded remote viewing research program at Stanford Research Institute, and this Journal of Scientific Exploration article is his own published account of that program's origins, methods and claimed results. As the program's own co-director's account it is the correct primary source for what the researchers themselves claimed to have done and found, in their own words. Its limit is substantial, the Journal of Scientific Exploration is a niche publication for parapsychological topics rather than a mainstream peer-reviewed science journal, and the remote viewing program's methodology and claimed results drew sustained criticism from independent scientific reviewers, so a claim about whether remote viewing actually works needs that independent critical assessment alongside this participant's own account.

Facts
Citation
Author
Harold E. Puthoff
Publisher
Journal of Scientific Exploration
Publication Year
1996
URL
https://www.newdualism.org/papers/H.Puthoff/CIA-Initiated%20Remote%20Viewing%20At%20Stanford%20Research%20Institute.htm
Source Type
Primary account
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, a peer reviewed venue for anomalies research outside mainstream science; Puthoff's own primary account of the SRI program, placed at the middle tier as a field-specific rather than a mainstream academic press publication.
Notes
Puthoff's own published account of the CIA-funded remote viewing program at Stanford Research Institute.
Claims Backed By This Source (37 claims)

This source backs 37 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 11 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Organizations, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Psi Phenomena, 3 claims: 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Studies, 3 claims: 2 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.