Jan J. de Wolf's study of circumcision and initiation practices in western Kenya and eastern Uganda is a peer-reviewed anthropological article examining historical reconstruction alongside ethnographic evidence for male initiation rites across several related Bantu-speaking communities. Its authority rests on de Wolf's combination of archival historical sources with fieldwork-based ethnographic method, allowing comparison of how these rites have changed and persisted across documented history rather than presenting a single static ethnographic snapshot. As a comparative regional study, it necessarily generalizes across related but distinct communities to identify shared patterns, and readers wanting the specific ritual detail of any single community's practice are better served by a dedicated single-community ethnography that this broader comparative article's own citations point toward.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Jan J. de Wolf's study, published in the peer reviewed journal Anthropos, is a peer reviewed anthropological article combining archival historical sources with fieldwork-based ethnographic method, treated at the top tier as peer reviewed journal scholarship. NotesThe classic comparative study treating Bagisu (Uganda) and Bukusu (Kenya) circumcision together as one historical tradition split by the colonial border.
Citation
AuthorJan J. de Wolf
PublisherAnthropos, vol. 78
Publication Year1983
Source TypeJournal article
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Religions, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Rituals, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.