Lata Mani is a scholar of colonial South Asian history, and this University of California Press book is her academic study of the colonial-era debate over sati, ritual widow immolation, in early nineteenth century Bengal. Its strength is a specific and influential argument, that the debate as it actually unfolded was conducted between British officials and Indian male elites over the authority of Hindu scripture and the proper role of the colonial state, with the women who were burned themselves largely marginal to the argument being made in their name. Its limit is that it is a study of this specific colonial Bengali debate and its textual record, so a claim about sati's practice or meaning outside this particular controversy, in another region or period, needs a different, more general source.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A university press study arguing that the colonial debate on sati was conducted over the authority of scripture and the proper role of the colonial state, with the women who burned marginal to that debate. NotesArgues that the colonial debate on sati was conducted over the authority of scripture, the nature of Hindu tradition and the proper role of the colonial state, and that the women who burned were marginal to it.
Citation
AuthorLata Mani
PublisherUniversity of California Press
Publication Year1998
URLhttps://archive.org/details/contentioustradi0000mani
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Mani the Prophet directly: "Lata Mani is a scholar of colonial South Asian history, and this University of California Press book is her academic study of the colonial-era debate over sati, ritual widow immolation, in early..."
Sati, Deities This source names Sati directly: "study of the colonial-era debate over sati, ritual widow immolation, in early nineteenth century Bengal."
Claims Backed By This Source (45 claims)
This source backs 45 claims across the atlas. As facts: 31 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 4 holds, 1 connected. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Deities, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Studies, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 1 general references.
- Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Religious Legal Instruments, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Religious Events, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Empires & Polities, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Well-attested
31Religious Legal Instruments
Scholarly debate
2Religious Legal Instruments
Holds
4Religious Legal Instruments
General References
6Religious Legal Instruments
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.