Home›Sources›Davis, The Serpent and the Rainbow (book), Simon and Schuster, 1985SourcesDavis, The Serpent and the Rainbow (book), Simon and Schuster, 1985Citation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Davis, The Serpent and the Rainbow (book), Simon and Schuster, 1985." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/davis-serpent-and-the-rainbow-book-1985.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Davis, The Serpent and the Rainbow (book), Simon and Schuster, 1985. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/davis-serpent-and-the-rainbow-book-1985Copy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-davis-the-serpent-and-the-rainbow-book-s, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Davis, The Serpent and the Rainbow (book), Simon and Schuster, 1985}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/sources/davis-serpent-and-the-rainbow-book-1985}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXWade Davis's own account of his fieldwork in Haiti as a Harvard trained ethnobotanist, investigating the case of Clairvius Narcisse and the wider phenomenon of reported zombification. Its strength is that it is the primary scholarship the 1988 film adapted, giving a documented baseline for what the film changed. Its limit, honestly recorded rather than smoothed over, is that its central scientific claim, that a specific poison drawn from puffer fish and other ingredients explains zombification, was contested by other researchers who reported finding little or no tetrodotoxin in the samples Davis provided, so the book is cited here for its documented fieldwork and its relationship to the film, not as settled science.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (11 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested2Reliability tier 2: a trade nonfiction book from a major commercial publisher, Simon and Schuster, written by a credentialed ethnobotanist under ordinary trade editing rather than academic peer review.NotesWell-attestedISBN 978-0-684-83929-5. Bibliographic and scientific-reception detail confirmed against Wikipedia's own article on the book, which names the specific published criticism: Terrence Hines, "Zombies and Tetrodotoxin," Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. 32, Issue 3, 2008, pages 60 to 62; and William Booth, "Voodoo Science," Science, 1988, reporting that some scientists found little or no tetrodotoxin in Davis's samples. Davis responded in a 1998 Science letter, arguing sample variability and testing error as explanations. Cited here for the documented record of that scientific debate, not for the disputed claim itself.CitationAuthorWell-attestedWade DavisPublisherWell-attestedSimon and SchusterPublication YearWell-attested1985Source TypeWell-attestedbookClaims Backed By This Source (11 claims)This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicSources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.Articles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.Screen Works, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.Well-attested9ArticlesA Scholar on Set, and a Story That Would Not Stay HisScreen WorksThe Serpent and the Rainbow (1988 Film)SourcesDavis, The Serpent and the Rainbow (book), Simon and Schuster, 1985General References2ArticlesA Scholar on Set, and a Story That Would Not Stay HisScreen WorksThe Serpent and the Rainbow (1988 Film)Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year