James L. Watson and Evelyn S. Rawski edited this University of California Press volume, an academic collection examining Chinese funerary ritual from the late imperial period into the modern era, with contributors addressing both the underlying structural unity of Chinese death ritual and its considerable regional and historical variation. Its strength is the specific argument the volume as a whole develops, that Chinese funerary ritual maintained a recognizable orthopraxy, a shared structure of correct ritual performance, even amid real regional and dynastic variation in belief, a genuinely influential thesis in Chinese religious studies. Its limit, as with any edited collection, is that individual chapters vary in period and regional focus, so a claim about one specific region's or era's funerary practice is best checked against the specific chapter addressing it.
Facts
Citation
AuthorJames L. Watson and Evelyn S. Rawski (eds.)
PublisherUniversity of California Press
Publication Year1988
URLhttps://archive.org/details/deathritualinlat0000unse
Source TypeEdited volume
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
An edited scholarly volume on Chinese funerary ritual from the late imperial period to the modern era, from the University of California Press. NotesEdited scholarly volume on Chinese funerary ritual from the late imperial period to the modern era.
Claims Backed By This Source (57 claims)
This source backs 57 claims across the atlas. As facts: 45 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Practices, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Realms, 10 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Mythical Creatures, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Rituals, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Cultures, 3 claims: 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Holidays & Festivals, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Doctrines, 1 claims: 1 holds.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.