Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Decagonal and Quasi-Crystalline Tilings in Medieval Islamic Architecture

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Peter Lu and Paul Steinhardt's paper on decagonal and quasi-crystalline tilings in medieval Islamic architecture is a peer-reviewed physics and materials-science study published in Science, arguing from close geometric analysis of surviving girih tile patterns that some medieval architects achieved a form of quasi-crystalline tiling five centuries before the mathematics was formally described in the West. That is a strong empirical claim about pattern geometry, grounded in reproducible measurement of real building facades. Its limit is that it is a claim about geometric structure, not a claim about the design intentions or theoretical understanding of the historical craftsmen who built the patterns, a distinction the authors themselves are careful to draw and that some art historians have pressed further, questioning how much conscious mathematical insight the finding implies versus skilled empirical practice passed down through pattern books.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Peter Lu and Paul Steinhardt's paper, published in Science in 2007, is a peer reviewed physics and materials-science study grounded in reproducible geometric measurement of real building facades, treated at the top tier as leading-journal peer reviewed science.
Notes
Peer-reviewed study of decagonal and quasi-crystalline geometric tilings in medieval Islamic architecture, Science, 2007.
Citation
Author
Peter J. Lu and Paul J. Steinhardt
Publisher
Science 315, pp. 1106-1110
Publication Year
2007
URL
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135491
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Geometry, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Sacred Sites, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Holds

3

Sacred Geometry

General References

2

Sacred Geometry

Sacred Sites

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.