Sources
Deutsche Mythologie
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Deutsche Mythologie is Jacob Grimm's own 1835 philological study, and it is the source of the reconstructed Continental goddess Ostara, whom Grimm inferred from the Old High German name for Easter, Ostarun, read alongside Bede's single eighth century mention of an Anglo-Saxon goddess Eostre. As the originating text it is the correct source for how that reconstruction was actually built and on what evidence. Its limit is exactly that: it is a nineteenth century philological inference from a place-name pattern and one outside testimony, not a report of an attested cult, so a claim asserting Ostara as a documented, worshipped goddess rather than a scholarly reconstruction needs to be checked against the thin primary evidence Grimm himself was working from.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Published by Dieterich as Jacob Grimm's own primary 1835 philological study; a foundational text in its own right but a nineteenth century inference from a place-name pattern and one outside testimony rather than a report of a documented cult, hence the middle tier. Notes1835. The source of the reconstructed Continental goddess Ostara, inferred from the Old High German name for Easter and from Bede. A philological reconstruction, not a testimony.
Citation
AuthorJacob Grimm
PublisherDieterich
Gottingen, 1835 first edition (Part I). Publication Year1835
Source TypeScholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Anglo-Saxons directly: "Deutsche Mythologie is Jacob Grimm's own 1835 philological study, and it is the source of the reconstructed Continental goddess Ostara, whom Grimm inferred from the Old High German name for Easter..."
This source names Eostre directly: "mention of an Anglo-Saxon goddess Eostre."
This source names Saxons directly: "Deutsche Mythologie is Jacob Grimm's own 1835 philological study, and it is the source of the reconstructed Continental goddess Ostara, whom Grimm inferred from the Old High German name for Easter..."
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)
This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 3 holds.
- Articles, 9 claims: 9 well-attested.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Plants, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Holidays & Festivals, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
22Myths & Sacred Narratives
Holds
5Myths & Sacred Narratives
General References
4Myths & Sacred Narratives
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.