Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Bart D. Ehrman is a historian of early Christianity, and this HarperOne book is his standard scholarly treatment of the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth, arguing against Jesus mythicist positions from the methods of historical criticism. Its strength is that Ehrman, though himself not a believer, argues the historical case using the standard tools of the field and is a widely cited specialist in New Testament studies. Its limit is that the book is written for a general audience as much as for specialists, and some of Ehrman's specific arguments have drawn criticism from other historians on points of method, so a claim resting on a particular disputed detail should be checked against the wider scholarly literature.

Facts
Citation
Author
Bart D. Ehrman
Publisher
HarperOne
Publication Year
2012
URL
https://archive.org/details/didjesusexisthis0000ehrm
Source Type
Scholarly work
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Bart Ehrman's standard scholarly treatment of the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth, from a leading historian of early Christianity though published by a general trade press.
Notes
Standard scholarly treatment of the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Nazareth, Cities

This source names Nazareth directly: "of the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth, arguing against Jesus mythicist positions from the methods of historical criticism."

Claims Backed By This Source (38 claims)

This source backs 38 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 9 claims: 9 well-attested.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Figures, 7 claims: 1 well-attested, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Scripture Portions, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Events, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Screen Works, 2 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Popular myth - corrected

1

General References

6

Figures

Historical Figures

Scripture Portions

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.