Encyclopaedia Britannica's article on the Digambara sect of Jainism. Reliable for the standard scholarly account of the Digambara-Svetambara division: the Digambara legend of a famine-driven migration south to Karnataka under Bhadrabahu during Chandragupta Maurya's reign, the article's own explicit caution that both sects' origin accounts are partisan and unreliable and that the earliest written Digambara version dates only from the tenth century CE, and its judgment that the split was more likely a gradual development completed by the first century CE rather than a single dateable event.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Professionally edited general encyclopedia, tier 2. Used for the Digambara-Svetambara split; the article itself names the split's dating as uncertain and legend-derived rather than settling it, which this atlas carries forward rather than smoothing over. NotesUsed for Jain monks' famine migration south to Karnataka and the Digambara-Svetambara split.
Citation
AuthorThe Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
PublisherEncyclopaedia Britannica
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/Digambara
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Digambara directly: "Britannica's article on the Digambara sect of Jainism."
This source names Svetambara directly: "Reliable for the standard scholarly account of the Digambara-Svetambara division: the Digambara legend of a famine-driven migration south to Karnataka under Bhadrabahu during Chandragupta Maurya's..."
Claims Backed By This Source (39 claims)
This source backs 39 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds, 2 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Spread Events, 17 claims: 4 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 7 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.