Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Does Psi Exist? Lack of Replication of an Anomalous Process of Information Transfer

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Julie Milton and Richard Wiseman's Does Psi Exist? Lack of Replication of an Anomalous Process of Information Transfer, published in Psychological Bulletin in 1999, is a peer reviewed meta-analysis finding that ganzfeld telepathy experiments conducted after an earlier influential positive meta-analysis failed, taken together, to replicate the claimed anomalous information transfer effect. Its strength is that it is peer reviewed and methodologically rigorous, published in a leading psychology review journal, and it remains a standard citation on the negative side of the ganzfeld replication debate specifically. Its limit is that it addresses one experimental paradigm within a still actively contested parapsychology literature, where proponents have raised methodological rejoinders since, so a claim about psi research generally should not treat this single meta-analysis as having settled the broader question either way.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Julie Milton and Richard Wiseman's Does Psi Exist?, published in Psychological Bulletin in 1999, is a peer reviewed, methodologically rigorous meta-analysis in a leading psychology review journal, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Julie Milton and Richard Wiseman's peer-reviewed article finding a lack of replication for the anomalous process of information transfer (psi) claimed in ganzfeld studies.
Citation
Author
Julie Milton and Richard Wiseman
Publisher
Psychological Bulletin
Publication Year
1999
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 critiqued Here. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Studies, 4 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 critiqued Here, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Psi Phenomena, 2 claims: 1 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
  • Disciplines, 1 claims: 1 critiqued Here.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.