Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Each Mind a Kingdom: American Women, Sexual Purity, and the New Thought Movement, 1875-1920

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Beryl Satter is a historian, and this University of California Press book is her scholarly study of the American New Thought movement between 1875 and 1920, focusing specifically on how its metaphysical teachings about mind and healing intersected with the era's women led movement for sexual purity reform. Its strength is that intersection: Satter reads New Thought's doctrine of mental self mastery directly against the gender politics of the period rather than treating the movement's ideas in isolation from the social reform activity many of its women adherents were also engaged in. Its limit is chronological and thematic focus, it covers this specific historical window and this specific strand of New Thought, so a claim about the movement's later twentieth century development needs a different, broader source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Beryl Satter's scholarly history of the American New Thought movement from 1875 to 1920 as it intersected with women's sexual purity reform; a study with a specific historical and gender focus, not a general source on New Thought's later twentieth century development.
Notes
Beryl Satter's scholarly history of the American New Thought movement (1875-1920) as it intersected with women's sexual purity reform. Use for established historical facts about New Thought doctrine and its women-led purity reform strand in this period; a study with a specific historical and gender focus, not a general source on New Thought's later twentieth-century development.
Citation
Author
Beryl Satter
Publisher
University of California Press
Publication Year
1999
URL
https://archive.org/details/eachmindkingdoma0000satt
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (55 claims)

This source backs 55 claims across the atlas. As facts: 44 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 32 claims: 25 well-attested, 7 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Doctrines, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.