Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Early Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism: The Mahayana Context of the Gaudapadiya-karika

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Richard King's Early Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism: The Mahayana Context of the Gaudapadiya-karika, published by State University of New York Press in 1995, is a peer reviewed academic monograph examining the Mahayana Buddhist influences on an early and foundational Advaita Vedanta text. Its authority rests on standard university press review and King's specialist standing in comparative Indian philosophy. Its central argument, that early Advaita drew more on Buddhist thought than later Advaita tradition has generally acknowledged, remains a position within an active and still debated area of Indology rather than an uncontested consensus.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Richard King's Early Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism: The Mahayana Context of the Gaudapadiya-karika, published by State University of New York Press in 1995, the top tier reflecting a peer reviewed academic monograph resting on standard university press review and King's specialist standing in comparative Indian philosophy. Its central argument, that early Advaita drew more on Buddhist thought than later tradition has generally acknowledged, remains a position within an active and still debated area of Indology rather than an uncontested consensus.
Notes
Academic study of the Mahayana Buddhist context of the Gaudapadiya-karika in early Advaita Vedanta.
Citation
Author
Richard King
Publisher
State University of New York Press
Publication Year
1995
URL
https://sunypress.edu/Books/E/Early-Advaita-Vedanta-and-Buddhism
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

New York, Cities

This source names New York directly: "published by State University of New York Press in 1995, is a peer reviewed academic monograph examining the Mahayana Buddhist influences on an early and foundational Advaita Vedanta text."

Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Scripture Portions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.