Edward Slingerland's Effortless Action, Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China, published by Oxford University Press in 2003, is a scholarly study tracing wu-wei, the classical Chinese ideal of effortless, spontaneous right action, across early Confucian, Daoist and other philosophical texts, using cognitive linguistics' conceptual metaphor theory as an analytical framework alongside close textual reading. Slingerland is a specialist in early Chinese thought working at the intersection of philology and cognitive science. Its strength is that it treats wu-wei as a shared problem debated differently across competing early Chinese schools rather than as one tradition's private doctrine. Its limit is that its cognitive-linguistic framework is itself one interpretive approach among several in early China studies, so a claim resting on Slingerland's specific metaphor analysis should be distinguished from more purely philological or historical readings of the same texts.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Edward Slingerland's Effortless Action, Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China, published by Oxford University Press in 2003, is a peer reviewed scholarly study by a specialist in early Chinese thought, treated at the top tier. NotesEdward Slingerland's scholarly study of wu-wei as a conceptual metaphor and spiritual ideal in early China.
Citation
AuthorEdward Slingerland
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication Year2003
Source Typebook
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names China directly: "Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China, published by Oxford University Press in 2003, is a scholarly study tracing wu-wei, the classical Chinese ideal of effortless, spontaneous right action..."
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)
This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Doctrines, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.